>>> Digimer schrieb am 07.10.2020 um 05:42 in Nachricht
:
> Hi all,
>
> While developing our program (and not being a production cluster), I
> find that when I push broken code to a node, causing the RA to fail to
> perform an operation, the node gets fenced. (example below).
(I see others hav
On 2020-10-07 2:20 a.m., Digimer wrote:
> On 2020-10-07 1:49 a.m., Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> 07.10.2020 06:42, Digimer пишет:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> While developing our program (and not being a production cluster), I
>>> find that when I push broken code to a node, causing the RA to fail to
>>> pe
>>> "Lentes, Bernd" schrieb am 06.10.2020
um
19:57 in Nachricht
<187946767.10825794.1602007021469.javamail.zim...@helmholtz-muenchen.de>:
...
> But vm_ssh ... why are some instance-attributes of it named with
> snapanalysis?
I don't know why, but you could edit the name to fix it.
> I didn't c
On 2020-10-07 1:49 a.m., Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 07.10.2020 06:42, Digimer пишет:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> While developing our program (and not being a production cluster), I
>> find that when I push broken code to a node, causing the RA to fail to
>> perform an operation, the node gets fenced. (examp
07.10.2020 06:42, Digimer пишет:
> Hi all,
>
> While developing our program (and not being a production cluster), I
> find that when I push broken code to a node, causing the RA to fail to
> perform an operation, the node gets fenced. (example below).
>
> This brings up a question;
>
> If
Hi all,
While developing our program (and not being a production cluster), I
find that when I push broken code to a node, causing the RA to fail to
perform an operation, the node gets fenced. (example below).
This brings up a question;
If a single resource fails for any reason and can't be
I agree,
it's more of a routing problem.
Actually a static route should fix the issue.
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
В вторник, 6 октомври 2020 г., 10:50:24 Гринуич+3, Jan Friesse
написа:
Richard ,
> To clarify my problem, this is more on Qdevice issue I want to fix.
The question
On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 19:57 +0200, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> i have a very strange problem with my CIB.
> We have a two-node cluster running about 15 VirtualDomains as
> resources.
> Two of them seem to be messed up.
> Here is the config from crm:
>
> primitive vm_ssh VirtualDomain \
>
Hi guys,
i have a very strange problem with my CIB.
We have a two-node cluster running about 15 VirtualDomains as resources.
Two of them seem to be messed up.
Here is the config from crm:
primitive vm_ssh VirtualDomain \
params config="/mnt/share/vm_ssh.xml" \
params hypervisor="q
05.10.2020 20:55, Richard Seo пишет:
>
>> Create host route via specific device.
> I've looked over the docs, haven't found a way to do this. I've tried
> configuring corosync.conf using the specific ip addresses. Could you
> specify
> how to route to a specific network adapter from a
After research, that appears to be the case. Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Users On Behalf Of Valentin Vidic
> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 5:46 AM
> To: users@clusterlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Open Source Linux Load Balancer with HA and Split
> Brain Prevention?
>
> O
Richard ,
To clarify my problem, this is more on Qdevice issue I want to fix.
The question is, how much it is really qdevice problem and if so, if
there is really something we can do about the problem.
Qdevice itself is just using standard connect(2) call and standard TCP
socket. So from q
12 matches
Mail list logo