Firewall issue ?
Did you check on corosync level if all nodes reach each other ?
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
В сряда, 28 юли 2021 г., 16:32:51 ч. Гринуич+3, S Sathish S via Users
написа:
Hi Team,
we are trying to add node03 to existing cluster after adding we could see
So far, I never had a cluster with nodes directly connected to the same
switches. Usually it's a nodeA -> switchA -> switchB -> nodeB and sometimes
connectivity between switches goes down (for example a firewall rule).
Best Regards,
Strahil Nikolov
В сряда, 28 юли 2021 г., 15:51:36 ч.
On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 08:51 -0400, john tillman wrote:
> > Technically you could give one vote to one node and zero to the
> > other.Â
> > If they lose contact only the server with one vote would make
> > quorum.Â
> > The downside is that if the server with 1 vote goes down the entire
> >
Hi Team,
we are trying to add node03 to existing cluster after adding we could see only
2 nodes are configured and validated corosync log also "Waiting for all cluster
members. Current votes: 2 expected_votes: 3" but in node3 pcs cluster status
output it show 3 nodes are configured and no
> Technically you could give one vote to one node and zero to the other.Â
> If they lose contact only the server with one vote would make quorum.Â
> The downside is that if the server with 1 vote goes down the entire
> cluster comes to a halt.
>
>
> That said, if both nodes can reach the same
