>>> Tyler Phillippe via Users schrieb am 14.11.2022 um
15:48 in Nachricht :
> Hi Vladislav,
>
> If I don't use the Scale-Out File Server, I don't have any issues with iSCSI
> speeds: if I directly connect the LUN(s) to the individual servers, I get
> 'full' speed - it just seems the Scale-Out F
Actually, I think I just figured it out - it's the Microsoft Continuous
Availability. It slows everything down to a crawl - sounds like that's almost
by design for some reason.
Thanks!
Respectfully,
Tyler
Nov 14, 2022, 9:48 AM by tylerphilli...@tutamail.com:
> Hi Vladislav,
>
> If I don't
Hi Vladislav,
If I don't use the Scale-Out File Server, I don't have any issues with iSCSI
speeds: if I directly connect the LUN(s) to the individual servers, I get
'full' speed - it just seems the Scale-Out File Server is causing the issue.
Very strange of Microsoft (though not totally unexpec
Hi
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 15:00 +0100, Tyler Phillippe via Users wrote:
> Good idea! I setup a RAM disk on both of those systems, let them
> sync, added it to the cluster.
>
> One thing I left out (which didn't hit me until yesterday as a
> possibility) is that I have the iSCSI LUN attached to tw
Good idea! I setup a RAM disk on both of those systems, let them sync, added it
to the cluster.
One thing I left out (which didn't hit me until yesterday as a possibility) is
that I have the iSCSI LUN attached to two Windows servers that are acting as a
Scale-Out File Server. When I copied a f
