Re: [ClusterLabs] DRBD on asymmetric-cluster

2016-04-07 Thread Jason Voorhees
>> Agree. So far I haven't created any ordering constraints because it >> isn't important to me, YET, the order for starting services. However I >> have a question... if I don't have any ordering constraints at all, am >> I still able to activate resources no matter the order? > > Sort of, but not

Re: [ClusterLabs] DRBD on asymmetric-cluster

2016-04-07 Thread Jason Voorhees
> FYI, commands that "move" a resource do so by adding location > constraints. The ID of these constraints will start with "cli-". They > override the normal behavior of the cluster, and stay in effect until > you explicitly remove them. (With pcs, you can remove them with "pcs > resource clear".)

Re: [ClusterLabs] DRBD on asymmetric-cluster

2016-04-06 Thread Jason Voorhees
or clusterdataClone? I want to make nodo2 Primary and nodo1 Secondary but I have no idea how to do this manually (only for testing) I hope someone can help :( Thanks in advance On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Jason Voorhees wrote: > I started reading "Pacemaker explained" but as it&#

Re: [ClusterLabs] DRBD on asymmetric-cluster

2016-04-04 Thread Jason Voorhees
I started reading "Pacemaker explained" but as it's so depth I didn't read that section regarding rules yet. I'll take a look at it and test it before asking anything again. Thanks a lot Ken On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 04/02/2016 01

[ClusterLabs] DRBD on asymmetric-cluster

2016-04-01 Thread Jason Voorhees
Hello guys: I've been recently reading "Pacemaker - Clusters from scratch" and working on a CentOS 7 system with pacemaker 1.1.13, corosync-2.3.4 and drbd84-utils-8.9.5. The PDF instructs how to create a DRBD resource that seems to be automatically started due to a symmetric-cluster setup. Howev