On 08/24/2015 12:20 PM, Digimer wrote:
> Speaking from a gfs2 background, but assuming it's similar in concept to
> ocfs2...
>
> Cluster locking comes at a performance cost. All locks need to be
> coordinated between the nodes, and that will always be slower that local
> locking only. They are als
On 08/24/2015 06:20 PM, Digimer wrote:
> Cluster locking comes at a performance cost. All locks need to be
> coordinated between the nodes, and that will always be slower that local
> locking only. They are also far less commonly used than options like nfs.
right.
> Using a pair of nodes with a t
On 24/08/15 07:55 AM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> On 08/24/2015 06:52 AM, Kai Dupke wrote:
>> Not sure what you want to run on top of your 2-node cluster, but OCFS2
>> is only needed when you need a shared file system.
>
> This is for an application that manages the high-availability by itself
> (in a
On 08/24/2015 06:52 AM, Kai Dupke wrote:
> Not sure what you want to run on top of your 2-node cluster, but OCFS2
> is only needed when you need a shared file system.
This is for an application that manages the high-availability by itself
(in an active/active fashion) and the only thing that's nee
On 08/23/2015 08:13 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
[...]
Not sure what you want to run on top of your 2-node cluster, but OCFS2
is only needed when you need a shared file system.
For plain failover with volumes managed by cLVM you don't need OCFS2
(and can save one level of complexity).
greetings
Kai
On 23/08/15 04:40 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> On 08/23/2015 02:16 PM, Digimer wrote:
>> One, this is on-topic, so don't worry. :)
>
> Thanks.
>
>> Two, I've never used ocfs2 (allergic to all things Oracle), but clvmd
>> makes LVM cluster-aware, as you know. So I have no idea why they'd say
>> tha
On 08/23/2015 02:16 PM, Digimer wrote:
> One, this is on-topic, so don't worry. :)
Thanks.
> Two, I've never used ocfs2 (allergic to all things Oracle), but clvmd
> makes LVM cluster-aware, as you know. So I have no idea why they'd say
> that.
I just restarted everything and then it worked. I wa
On 08/23/2015 03:35 PM, emmanuel segura wrote:
> please, share your cluster logs && config and so on.
Thanks Emmanuel. I wiped everyting; reverted to previous known
good-snapshot on my VMs :) But it does work indeed as I just mentioned
Digimer.
--
Jorge
___
please, share your cluster logs && config and so on.
2015-08-23 20:16 GMT+02:00 Digimer :
> On 23/08/15 02:13 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm still doing some tests on SLES 11 SP4 & I was trying to run
>> "mkfs.ocfs2" against a logical volume (with all infrastructure
>> ready: cLVM & DL
On 23/08/15 02:13 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm still doing some tests on SLES 11 SP4 & I was trying to run
> "mkfs.ocfs2" against a logical volume (with all infrastructure
> ready: cLVM & DLM & o2cb) but it gives me errors while creating it. If
> I run it against a raw device (no LVM)
Hi,
I'm still doing some tests on SLES 11 SP4 & I was trying to run
"mkfs.ocfs2" against a logical volume (with all infrastructure
ready: cLVM & DLM & o2cb) but it gives me errors while creating it. If
I run it against a raw device (no LVM) it works.
Then I found this from an Oracle PDF:
"It is
11 matches
Mail list logo
