>>> Nurit Vilosny <nur...@mellanox.com> schrieb am 08.09.2016 um 16:44 in >>> Nachricht <db6pr0501mb2008afdc335931072c4ca21aa7...@db6pr0501mb2008.eurprd05.prod.outlook. om>: > Hi everyone, > I have a very basic question that I couldn't find an answer for. > I am using the pacemaker to control a 3 nodes cluster, with a private > application that works in an active - standby - standby mode. > My node have priorities in which is better to migrate to. I implemented it > via location constraint scores. > I want to give my user the ability to migrate / failover from the active to > one of the / or specific standby.
Why would a user have to do that? The only thing I can imaging is software updates. > What is the correct way to do it? > Currently I am changing the location constraint score to make pacemaker move > my resources, but I think this method is wrong. Why not using "resource migrate"? > > Thanks, > Nurit _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
