: 16 dicembre 2020 19.57.31 CET
Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Recoveing from node failure
On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 15:16 +0100, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Ok, I used some OpenIndiana patches and now it works, and also
> accepts the pcmk_delay_base param.
Good to know. Beyond en
eXoplanets : https://gabrielebulfon.bandcamp.com/album/exoplanets
^^^ wow, love it
>
>
>
> Da: Gabriele Bulfon
> A: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering
> welcomed
> Data: 16 dicembre 2020 9.27.31 CET
> Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re:
topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
Data: 16 dicembre 2020 9.27.31 CET
Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Recoveing from node failure
Thanks! I updated package to version 1.1.24, but now I receive an error on
pacemaker.log :
Dec 16 09:08:23 [5090] pacemakerd
: Andrei Borzenkov
A: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
Data: 15 dicembre 2020 10.52.46 CET
Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Recoveing from node failure
pcmk_delay_base was introduced in 1.1.17 and you apparently have
1.1.15 (unless it was backported
A: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
Data: 14 dicembre 2020 15.56.32 CET
Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Recoveing from node failure
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 2:40 PM Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
>
> I isolated the log when everything happens (when I d
Andrei Borzenkov
> A: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
>
> Data: 14 dicembre 2020 15.56.32 CET
> Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Recoveing from node failure
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 2:40 PM Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> &g
--
Da: Ulrich Windl
A: users@clusterlabs.org
Data: 14 dicembre 2020 11.53.22 CET
Oggetto: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Recoveing from node failure
>>> Gabriele Bulfon schrieb am 14.12.2020 um 11:48 in
Nachricht <1065144646.7212.16079
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 2:40 PM Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
>
> I isolated the log when everything happens (when I disable the ha interface),
> attached here.
>
And where are matching logs from the second node?
___
Manage your subscription:
--
Da: Ulrich Windl
A: users@clusterlabs.org
Data: 14 dicembre 2020 8.52.16 CET
Oggetto: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Recoveing from node failure
>>> Gabriele Bulfon schrieb am 11.12.2020 um 15:51 in
>>> Gabriele Bulfon schrieb am 14.12.2020 um 11:48 in
Nachricht <1065144646.7212.1607942889206@www>:
> Thanks!
>
> I tried first option, by adding pcmk_delay_base to the two stonith
> primitives.
> First has 1 second, second has 5 seconds.
> It didn't work :( they still killed each other :(
>
>>> Gabriele Bulfon schrieb am 11.12.2020 um 15:51 in
Nachricht <1053095478.6540.1607698288628@www>:
> I cannot "use wait_for_all: 0", cause this would move automatically a powered
> off node from UNCLEAN to OFFLINE and mount the ZFS pool (total risk!): I want
> to manually move from UNCLEAN to
11 matches
Mail list logo
