On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 08:09:34AM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 29.08.2016 um 16:37 in
> Nachricht <20160829143700.GA1538@tuttle.homenet>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 02:58:11PM +0200, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> >> I think the main
>>> Lars Ellenberg schrieb am 29.08.2016 um 22:07 in
Nachricht <20160829200739.GQ5268@soda.linbit>:
[...]
> And no, I strongly do not think that we should "fall back" to the
> "art" of shell syntax and idioms that was force on you by the original"
>
>>> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais schrieb am 29.08.2016 um
>>> 18:04 in
Nachricht <20160829180440.5b7f1a2e@firost>:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 10:02:28 -0500
> Ken Gaillot wrote:
>
>> On 08/29/2016 09:43 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> ...
>>> I doubt that we
>>> Dmitri Maziuk schrieb am 29.08.2016 um 17:13 in
Nachricht <161a5209-166c-e837-dcb0-169b8a4b3...@gmail.com>:
> On 2016-08-29 04:06, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
>> Thanks, though this does not work :)
>
> Uhm... right. Too many languages, sorry: perl's system() will call
>>> Gabriele Bulfon schrieb am 29.08.2016 um 17:08 in
Nachricht <14184995.610.1472483315074.JavaMail.sonicle@www>:
> Sure, infact I can change all shebang to point to /bin/bash and it's ok.
> The question is about current shebang /bin/sh which may go into trouble (as
> if
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 29.08.2016 um 16:37 in
Nachricht <20160829143700.GA1538@tuttle.homenet>:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 02:58:11PM +0200, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
>> I think the main issue is the usage of the "local" operator in ocf*
>> I'm not an expert on
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 29.08.2016 um 15:47 in
>>> Nachricht
<8ca22867-2103-b2da-316b-ac97234f8...@redhat.com>:
> On 08/29/2016 04:17 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
[...]
>
> Interesting, I thought local was posix, but it's not. It seems everyone
> but solaris implemented