Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
28.02.2020 01:55, Ken Gaillot пишет: > On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 22:39 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >> 27.02.2020 20:54, Ken Gaillot пишет: >>> On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 18:43 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais >>> wrote: >> Speaking about shutdown, what is the status of clean shutdown >> of

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 22:39 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 27.02.2020 20:54, Ken Gaillot пишет: > > On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 18:43 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais > > wrote: > > > > > Speaking about shutdown, what is the status of clean shutdown > > > > > of > > > > > the > > > > > cluster handle

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 20:42 +0200, Strahil Nikolov wrote: > On February 27, 2020 7:00:36 PM GMT+02:00, Ken Gaillot < > kgail...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 17:28 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:48:23 -0600 > > > Ken Gaillot wrote: > > >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
27.02.2020 20:54, Ken Gaillot пишет: > On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 18:43 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: Speaking about shutdown, what is the status of clean shutdown of the cluster handled by Pacemaker? Currently, I advice to stop resources gracefully (eg. using pcs re

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Strahil Nikolov
On February 27, 2020 7:00:36 PM GMT+02:00, Ken Gaillot wrote: >On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 17:28 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:48:23 -0600 >> Ken Gaillot wrote: >> >> > On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 15:01 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais >> > wrote: >> > > On Thu, 27 F

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:54:52 -0600 Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 18:43 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > > > Speaking about shutdown, what is the status of clean shutdown of > > > > the > > > > cluster handled by Pacemaker? Currently, I advice to stop > > > > resources >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 18:43 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > > Speaking about shutdown, what is the status of clean shutdown of > > > the > > > cluster handled by Pacemaker? Currently, I advice to stop > > > resources > > > gracefully (eg. using pcs resource disable [...]) before shutt

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 11:00:36 -0600 Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 17:28 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:48:23 -0600 > > Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 15:01 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 17:28 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:48:23 -0600 > Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 15:01 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:24:46 +0100 > > > "Ulrich Windl" wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:48:23 -0600 Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 15:01 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:24:46 +0100 > > "Ulrich Windl" wrote: > > > > > > > > Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais schrieb am > > > > > > 27.02.2020 um > > > > > > 11:

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 08:12 +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > > > Ken Gaillot schrieb am 26.02.2020 um > > > > 16:41 in Nachricht > > <2257e2a1e5fd88ae2b915b8241a8e8c9e150b95b.ca...@redhat.com>: > > [...] > > I considered a per-resource and/or per-node setting, but the target > > audience is someon

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 15:01 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:24:46 +0100 > "Ulrich Windl" wrote: > > > > > > Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais schrieb am > > > > > 27.02.2020 um > > > > 11:05 in > > Nachricht <20200227110502.3624cb87@firost>: > > > > [...] > > > W

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:24:46 +0100 "Ulrich Windl" wrote: > >>> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais schrieb am 27.02.2020 um > 11:05 in > Nachricht <20200227110502.3624cb87@firost>: > > [...] > > What about something like "lock‑location=bool" and > > For "lock-location" I would assume the value is

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-27 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais schrieb am 27.02.2020 um 11:05 in Nachricht <20200227110502.3624cb87@firost>: [...] > What about something like "lock‑location=bool" and For "lock-location" I would assume the value is a "location". I guess you wanted a "use-lock-location" Boolean value. > "lock‑

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Coming in Pacemaker 2.0.4: shutdown locks

2020-02-26 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 26.02.2020 um 16:41 in >>> Nachricht <2257e2a1e5fd88ae2b915b8241a8e8c9e150b95b.ca...@redhat.com>: [...] > I considered a per-resource and/or per-node setting, but the target > audience is someone who wants things as simple as possible. A per-node Actually, while it ma