Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Non recoverable state of cluster after exit of one node due to killing of processes by oom killer

2021-02-25 Thread shivraj dongawe
Thank you for your valuable feedback. I will surely check that ordering part. On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 5:21 PM Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Thu, 2021-02-25 at 06:34 +, shivraj dongawe wrote: > > > > @Ken Gaillot, Thanks for sharing your inputs on the possible behavior > > of the cluster. > >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Non recoverable state of cluster after exit of one node due to killing of processes by oom killer

2021-02-25 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Thu, 2021-02-25 at 06:34 +, shivraj dongawe wrote: > > @Ken Gaillot, Thanks for sharing your inputs on the possible behavior > of the cluster. > We have reconfirmed that dlm on a healthy node was waiting for > fencing of faulty node and shared storage access on the healthy node > was

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Non recoverable state of cluster after exit of one node due to killing of processes by oom killer

2021-02-24 Thread shivraj dongawe
@Ken Gaillot, Thanks for sharing your inputs on the possible behavior of the cluster. We have reconfirmed that dlm on a healthy node was waiting for fencing of faulty node and shared storage access on the healthy node was blocked during this process. Kindly let me know whether this is the natural

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Non recoverable state of cluster after exit of one node due to killing of processes by oom killer

2021-02-19 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Fri, 2021-02-19 at 07:48 +0530, shivraj dongawe wrote: > Any update on this . > Is there any issue in the configuration that we are using ? > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021, 14:40 shivraj dongawe > wrote: > > Kindly read "fencing is done using fence_scsi" from the previous > > message as "fencing is

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Non recoverable state of cluster after exit of one node due to killing of processes by oom killer

2021-02-18 Thread shivraj dongawe
Any update on this . Is there any issue in the configuration that we are using ? On Mon, Feb 15, 2021, 14:40 shivraj dongawe wrote: > Kindly read "fencing is done using fence_scsi" from the previous message > as "fencing is configured". > > As per the error messages we have analyzed node2

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Non recoverable state of cluster after exit of one node due to killing of processes by oom killer

2021-02-15 Thread shivraj dongawe
Kindly read "fencing is done using fence_scsi" from the previous message as "fencing is configured". As per the error messages we have analyzed node2 initiated fencing of node1 as many processes of node1 related to cluster have been killed by oom killer and node1 marked as down. Now many

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Non recoverable state of cluster after exit of one node due to killing of processes by oom killer

2021-02-15 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> shivraj dongawe schrieb am 15.02.2021 um 08:27 in Nachricht : > Fencing is done using fence_scsi. > Config details are as follows: > Resource: scsi (class=stonith type=fence_scsi) > Attributes: devices=/dev/mapper/mpatha pcmk_host_list="node1 node2" > pcmk_monitor_action=metadata