Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Corosync ring shown faulty between healthy nodes & networks (rrp_mode: passive)

2016-10-07 Thread Dmitri Maziuk
On 2016-10-07 01:18, Ulrich Windl wrote: Any hardware may fail at any time. We even had an onboard NIC, that stopped operating correctly some day, we had CPU chache errors, RAM parity errors, PCI bus errors, and everything you can imagine. :) http://dilbert.com/strip/1995-06-24 Our vendor's b

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Corosync ring shown faulty between healthy nodes & networks (rrp_mode: passive)

2016-10-06 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Dimitri Maziuk schrieb am 06.10.2016 um 18:02 in Nachricht <696bb029-2b44-aa4b-322e-b399dd741...@bmrb.wisc.edu>: > On 10/06/2016 09:26 AM, Klaus Wenninger wrote: > >> Usually one - at least me so far - would rather think that having >> the awareness of redundany/cluster as high up as possible

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Corosync ring shown faulty between healthy nodes & networks (rrp_mode: passive)

2016-10-06 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Martin Schlegel schrieb am 06.10.2016 um 11:38 in Nachricht <1736253685.165937.28a72b84-a091-48c4-83f9-74a8bbde1a18.open-xchange@email.1und1 de>: > Thanks for the confirmation Jan, but this sounds a bit scary to me ! > > Spinning this experiment a bit further ... > > Would this not also me