On 04/27/2016 09:08 AM, Klechomir wrote:
> Hi List,
> I have two major problems related to the VirtualDomain live migration
> and failover in general.
> I'm using Pacemaker 1.1.8, which is very stable and used to do
> everything right to me.
I completely understand staying on an older version that
Hi List,
I have two major problems related to the VirtualDomain live migration
and failover in general.
I'm using Pacemaker 1.1.8, which is very stable and used to do
everything right to me.
1. Live migration during failover (node standby or shutdown) is ok, but
during failback, the VMs (whic
great.
i think i am sorted now. thanks again everyone.
- Original Message -
From: "RaSca"
To: "users"
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 9:23:44 AM
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: kvm live migration, resource moving
The point here is that every time you do
s just a
> preference/priority (lower=higher prior)?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ulrich Windl"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 8:47:23 AM
> Subject: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: kvm live migration, resource moving
>
>>>
you mean instead of inf: ##: I thought the number was just a
preference/priority (lower=higher prior)?
- Original Message -
From: "Ulrich Windl"
To: "users"
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 8:47:23 AM
Subject: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: kvm live migration, resou
>>> Kyle O'Donnell schrieb am 04.02.2016 um 14:17 in Nachricht
<124846465.11794.1454591851253.javamail.zim...@0b10.mx>:
[...]
> I had:
> location cli-prefer-tome tome_kvm inf: ny4j1-kvm02
>
> removed that and I am all good!
[...]
That's why I ALWAYS specify a time when migrating resources. So i
