Re: [ClusterLabs] HA Cluster and Fencing

2015-09-03 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 09/03/2015 11:44 AM, Streeter, Michelle N wrote: > I was trying to get a HA Cluster working but it was not failing over. In > past posts, someone kept asking me to get the fencing working and make it a > priority. So I finally got the fencing to work with VBox. And the fail over > finally

Re: [ClusterLabs] HA Cluster and Fencing

2015-09-03 Thread Digimer
On 03/09/15 12:44 PM, Streeter, Michelle N wrote: > I was trying to get a HA Cluster working but it was not failing over. > In past posts, someone kept asking me to get the fencing working and > make it a priority. So I finally got the fencing to work with VBox. > And the fail over finally star

Re: [ClusterLabs] HA Cluster and Fencing

2015-09-03 Thread Kai Dupke
On 09/03/2015 06:44 PM, Streeter, Michelle N wrote: > Would you also help me explain why this is true? Mind to give us more details? What exact setup? What was in the logs? Just in case, clustering without fencing is a pretty bad idea in general, and in special when data is not only read-only ac

Re: [ClusterLabs] HA Cluster and Fencing

2015-09-03 Thread David Gersic
What wasn't working about your failover? Fencing is required for clustering, because it's how the cluster handles a failed node. From: Streeter, Michelle N Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 11:44 AM To: users@clusterlabs.org Subject: [ClusterLabs]

[ClusterLabs] HA Cluster and Fencing

2015-09-03 Thread Streeter, Michelle N
I was trying to get a HA Cluster working but it was not failing over. In past posts, someone kept asking me to get the fencing working and make it a priority. So I finally got the fencing to work with VBox. And the fail over finally started working for my HA cluster. When I tried to explai