Re: [ClusterLabs] Maximum cluster size with Pacemaker 2.x and Corosync 3.x, and scaling to hundreds of nodes

2020-07-30 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 23:12 +, Toby Haynes wrote: > In Corosync 1.x there was a limit on the maximum number of active > nodes in a corosync cluster - broswing the mailing list says 64 > hosts. The Pacemaker 1.1 documentation says scalability goes up to 16 > nodes. The Pacemaker 2.0 documentatio

Re: [ClusterLabs] Maximum cluster size with Pacemaker 2.x and Corosync 3.x, and scaling to hundreds of nodes

2020-07-29 Thread Reid Wahl
Addressing only the first paragraph of your message, inline below. I'll have to defer to others to answer the remainder. On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 4:12 PM Toby Haynes wrote: > In Corosync 1.x there was a limit on the maximum number of active nodes in > a corosync cluster - broswing the mailing lis

[ClusterLabs] Maximum cluster size with Pacemaker 2.x and Corosync 3.x, and scaling to hundreds of nodes

2020-07-29 Thread Toby Haynes
In Corosync 1.x there was a limit on the maximum number of active nodes in a corosync cluster - broswing the mailing list says 64 hosts. The Pacemaker 1.1 documentation says scalability goes up to 16 nodes. The Pacemaker 2.0 documentation says the same, although I can't find a maximum number of nod