tl;dr - dont port pacemaker, use pacemaker-remote instead
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Jan Friesse wrote:
> Ken Gaillot napsal(a):
>
>> On 05/17/2016 09:54 AM, Digimer wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16/05/16 04:35 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
On 05/16/2016 09:23 AM, Jan
Ken Gaillot napsal(a):
On 05/17/2016 09:54 AM, Digimer wrote:
On 16/05/16 04:35 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
On 05/16/2016 09:23 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
Hi,
I have an idea: use Pacemaker with Zookeeper (instead of Corosync). Is
it possible?
Is there any examination about that?
Indeed, would
On 05/17/2016 06:50 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
> On 05/17/2016 01:17 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
>> Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
>>> On 05/16/2016 09:23 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an idea: use Pacemaker with Zookeeper (instead of Corosync). Is
> it
Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 09:23 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have an idea: use Pacemaker with Zookeeper (instead of Corosync). Is
> >> it possible?
> >> Is there any examination about that?
>
> Indeed, would be *great* to have a Pacemaker based
On 05/16/2016 09:23 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have an idea: use Pacemaker with Zookeeper (instead of Corosync). Is
>> it possible?
>> Is there any examination about that?
Indeed, would be *great* to have a Pacemaker based control plane on top
of other "pluggable" distributed KVS &
Hi,
I have an idea: use Pacemaker with Zookeeper (instead of Corosync). Is
it possible?
Is there any examination about that?
From my point of view (and yes, I'm biased), biggest problem of
Zookeper is need to have quorum
Hi,
I have an idea: use Pacemaker with Zookeeper (instead of Corosync). Is
it possible?
Is there any examination about that?
Thanks for your help!
Hai Nguyen
--
This mail was scanned by BitDefender
For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com