On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 20:47 +0200, Kab Naj wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thank you very much for possible alternatives.
> I still prefer if group unordered resources were possible, but
> probably there was no demand for it.
>
> I understand that in all three provided options I wouldn't use
> resource
Hello,
thank you very much for possible alternatives.
I still prefer if group unordered resources were possible, but probably
there was no demand for it.
I understand that in all three provided options I wouldn't use resource
groups at all.
In option 2 - "all with A" trick, I would use A as
Hi,
You have a few alternatives to groups.
1 - You can configure independent colocation constraints for each
resource. E.g. "B with A", "C with B", etc. This has the advantage that
if you just want all the resources on the same node, you could colocate
all later resources with the first one ("B
Hello,
I was trying to set parallel execution of resources in resource group, but
I was not successful.
The goal was to have resources within one resource group in one location
but order of resources would rely on Ordering constraints, thus possibly
resources could run in parallel if constraints
