On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 9:30 AM Kazunori INOUE
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 11:09 PM Ken Gaillot wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 19:13 +0900, 井上和徳 wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Since O_DIRECT is not specified in open() [1], it reads the buffer
> > > cache and
> > > may result in a false
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 11:09 PM Ken Gaillot wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 19:13 +0900, 井上和徳 wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since O_DIRECT is not specified in open() [1], it reads the buffer
> > cache and
> > may result in a false negative. I fear that this possibility
> > increases
> > in environments
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:10 PM Ken Gaillot wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 19:13 +0900, 井上和徳 wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since O_DIRECT is not specified in open() [1], it reads the buffer
> > cache and
> > may result in a false negative. I fear that this possibility
> > increases
> > in environments
On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 19:13 +0900, 井上和徳 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since O_DIRECT is not specified in open() [1], it reads the buffer
> cache and
> may result in a false negative. I fear that this possibility
> increases
> in environments with large buffer cache and running disk-reading
> applications
>
Hello Kazunori-san,
On 02/08/2022 12.13, 井上和徳 wrote:
Hi,
Since O_DIRECT is not specified in open() [1], it reads the buffer cache and
may result in a false negative. I fear that this possibility increases
in environments with large buffer cache and running disk-reading applications
such as
Hi,
Since O_DIRECT is not specified in open() [1], it reads the buffer cache and
may result in a false negative. I fear that this possibility increases
in environments with large buffer cache and running disk-reading applications
such as database.
So, I think it's better to specify
