Re: [ClusterLabs] Redudant Ring Network failure

2020-06-11 Thread Valentin Vidić
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 09:46:14AM +0200, Jan Friesse wrote: > > Jan, > > > > actually we using this. > > > > [root@lvm-nfscpdata-05ct::~ 100 ]# apt show corosync > > Package: corosync > > Version: 3.0.1-2+deb10u1 > > > > [root@lvm-nfscpdata-05ct::~]# apt show libknet1 > > Package: libknet1 > >

Re: [ClusterLabs] Redudant Ring Network failure

2020-06-11 Thread Jan Friesse
clustering welcomed ; ROHWEDER-NEUBECK, MICHAEL (EXTERN) ; us...@lists.clusterlabs.org Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] Redudant Ring Network failure Michael, what version of knet you are using? We had quite a few problems with older versions of knet, so current stable is recommended (1.16). Same applies for

Re: [ClusterLabs] Redudant Ring Network failure

2020-06-10 Thread ROHWEDER-NEUBECK, MICHAEL (EXTERN)
related to open-source clustering welcomed Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] Redudant Ring Network failure It will be hard to guess if you are using sctp or udp/udpu. If possible share the corosync.conf (you can remove sensitive data, but make it meaningful). Are you using a firewall ? If yes

Re: [ClusterLabs] Redudant Ring Network failure

2020-06-10 Thread ROHWEDER-NEUBECK, MICHAEL (EXTERN)
...@lists.clusterlabs.org Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] Redudant Ring Network failure Michael, what version of knet you are using? We had quite a few problems with older versions of knet, so current stable is recommended (1.16). Same applies for corosync because 3.0.4 has vastly improved display of links

Re: [ClusterLabs] Redudant Ring Network failure

2020-06-10 Thread Jan Friesse
Michael, what version of knet you are using? We had quite a few problems with older versions of knet, so current stable is recommended (1.16). Same applies for corosync because 3.0.4 has vastly improved display of links status. Hello, We have massive problems with the redundant ring operatio

Re: [ClusterLabs] Redudant Ring Network failure

2020-06-09 Thread ROHWEDER-NEUBECK, MICHAEL (EXTERN)
Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed ; ROHWEDER-NEUBECK, MICHAEL (EXTERN) Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] Redudant Ring Network failure Are you using multicast ? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov На 9 юни 2020 г. 10:28:25 GMT+03:00, "ROHWEDER-NEUBECK, MICHAEL (EXTERN)"

Re: [ClusterLabs] Redudant Ring Network failure

2020-06-09 Thread Strahil Nikolov
ichael Niggemann > > >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: Strahil Nikolov >Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Juni 2020 19:30 >An: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering >welcomed ; ROHWEDER-NEUBECK, MICHAEL (EXTERN) > >Betreff: Re: [ClusterLabs] Redudant Ri

Re: [ClusterLabs] Redudant Ring Network failure

2020-06-09 Thread Strahil Nikolov
Are you using multicast ? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov На 9 юни 2020 г. 10:28:25 GMT+03:00, "ROHWEDER-NEUBECK, MICHAEL (EXTERN)" написа: >Hello, >We have massive problems with the redundant ring operation of our >Corosync / pacemaker 3 Node NFS clusters. > >Most of the nodes either have an ent

[ClusterLabs] Redudant Ring Network failure

2020-06-09 Thread ROHWEDER-NEUBECK, MICHAEL (EXTERN)
Hello, We have massive problems with the redundant ring operation of our Corosync / pacemaker 3 Node NFS clusters. Most of the nodes either have an entire ring offline or only 1 node in a ring. Example: (Node1 Ring0 333 Ring1 n33 | Node2 Ring0 033 Ring1 3n3 | Node3 Ring0 333 Ring 1 33n) corosyn