Ken Gaillot writes:
> On 03/07/2016 02:03 PM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
>
>> The transition-keys match, does this mean that the above is a late
>> result from the monitor operation which was considered timed-out
>> previously? How did it reach vhbl07, if the DC at that time was vhbl03?
>>
>>> The pe
Andrew Beekhof writes:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
>
>> Ken Gaillot writes:
>>
>>> On 03/07/2016 07:31 AM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
>>>
12:55:13 vhbl07 crmd[8484]: notice: Transition aborted by
vm-eiffel_monitor_6 'create' on vhbl05: Foreign event
(ma
On 03/07/2016 02:03 PM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Ken Gaillot writes:
>
>> On 03/07/2016 07:31 AM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
>>
>>> 12:55:13 vhbl07 crmd[8484]: notice: Transition aborted by
>>> vm-eiffel_monitor_6 'create' on vhbl05: Foreign event
>>> (magic=0:0;521:0:0:634eef05-39c1-4093-94d4-8d62
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Ken Gaillot writes:
>
> > On 03/07/2016 07:31 AM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> >
> >> 12:55:13 vhbl07 crmd[8484]: notice: Transition aborted by
> vm-eiffel_monitor_6 'create' on vhbl05: Foreign event
> (magic=0:0;521:0:0:634eef05-39c1-4093-94d
Ken Gaillot writes:
> On 03/07/2016 07:31 AM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
>
>> 12:55:13 vhbl07 crmd[8484]: notice: Transition aborted by
>> vm-eiffel_monitor_6 'create' on vhbl05: Foreign event
>> (magic=0:0;521:0:0:634eef05-39c1-4093-94d4-8d624b423bb7, cib=0.613.98,
>> source=process_graph_even
On 03/07/2016 07:31 AM, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A couple of days ago the nodes of our Pacemaker 1.1.14 cluster
> (vhbl0[3-7]) experienced temporary storage outage, leading to processes
> stucking randomly for a couple of minutes and big load spikes. There
> were 30 monitor operation timeou
Hi,
A couple of days ago the nodes of our Pacemaker 1.1.14 cluster
(vhbl0[3-7]) experienced temporary storage outage, leading to processes
stucking randomly for a couple of minutes and big load spikes. There
were 30 monitor operation timeouts altogether on vhbl05, and an internal
error on the DC.
