29.07.2019 22:07, Ken Gaillot пишет:
> On Sat, 2019-07-27 at 11:04 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> Is it possible to have single definition of resource set that is
>> later
>> references in order and location constraints? All syntax in
>> documentation or crmsh presumes inline set definition in l
On Sat, 2019-07-27 at 11:04 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> Is it possible to have single definition of resource set that is
> later
> references in order and location constraints? All syntax in
> documentation or crmsh presumes inline set definition in location or
> order statement.
>
> In this
27.07.2019 11:04, Andrei Borzenkov пишет:
> Is it possible to have single definition of resource set that is later
> references in order and location constraints? All syntax in
> documentation or crmsh presumes inline set definition in location or
> order statement.
>
> In this particular case the
Hi.
For location you can use regexps. That is supported in crmsh as well. For
order and colocation the similar feature should be implemented.
Andrei Borzenkov 27 Jul 2019 11:04:43 AM wrote
Is it possible to have single definition of resource set that is later
references in order and location
Is it possible to have single definition of resource set that is later
references in order and location constraints? All syntax in
documentation or crmsh presumes inline set definition in location or
order statement.
In this particular case there will be set of filesystems that need to be
colocate
