Delighful, thanks so much ken.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 02/09/2017 08:50 AM, Alejandro Comisario wrote:
> > Ken, thanks for yor reply.
> >
> > Since in our setup, we use active/active mysql clone, so i think that
> > order is the only way to ensure what i want.
>
On 02/09/2017 08:50 AM, Alejandro Comisario wrote:
> Ken, thanks for yor reply.
>
> Since in our setup, we use active/active mysql clone, so i think that
> order is the only way to ensure what i want.
> So, simple question, making order "Advisory", and tiking into
> consideration that "maybe" keys
Ken, thanks for yor reply.
Since in our setup, we use active/active mysql clone, so i think that order
is the only way to ensure what i want.
So, simple question, making order "Advisory", and tiking into consideration
that "maybe" keystone starts before mysql, making it fail because of
database co
On 02/06/2017 05:25 PM, Alejandro Comisario wrote:
> guys, really happy to post my first doubt.
>
> i'm kinda having an "conceptual" issue that's bringing me, lots of issues
> i need to ensure that order of starting resources are mandatory but
> that is causing me a huge issue, that is if just one
Any help ? thoughts ?
On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Alejandro Comisario
wrote:
> guys, really happy to post my first doubt.
>
> i'm kinda having an "conceptual" issue that's bringing me, lots of issues
> i need to ensure that order of starting resources are mandatory but
> that is causing me a
guys, really happy to post my first doubt.
i'm kinda having an "conceptual" issue that's bringing me, lots of issues
i need to ensure that order of starting resources are mandatory but
that is causing me a huge issue, that is if just one of the members of
a clone goes down and up (but not all memb