On Fri, 2019-07-12 at 13:33 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
> On 11/07/2019 14:16, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 10:39 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
> > > On 10/07/2019 15:50, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 11:26 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
> > > > > hi guys, possibly @devel if they
On 11/07/2019 14:16, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 10:39 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
>> On 10/07/2019 15:50, Ken Gaillot wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 11:26 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
hi guys, possibly @devel if they pop in here.
is there, will there be, a way to make cluster
On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 10:39 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
> On 10/07/2019 15:50, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 11:26 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
> > > hi guys, possibly @devel if they pop in here.
> > >
> > > is there, will there be, a way to make cluster deal with failed
> > > resources in
On 10/07/2019 15:50, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 11:26 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
>> hi guys, possibly @devel if they pop in here.
>>
>> is there, will there be, a way to make cluster deal with failed
>> resources in such a way that cluster would try not to give up on
>> failed
>>
On Wed, 2019-07-10 at 11:26 +0100, lejeczek wrote:
> hi guys, possibly @devel if they pop in here.
>
> is there, will there be, a way to make cluster deal with failed
> resources in such a way that cluster would try not to give up on
> failed
> resources?
>
> I understand that as of now the only
hi guys, possibly @devel if they pop in here.
is there, will there be, a way to make cluster deal with failed
resources in such a way that cluster would try not to give up on failed
resources?
I understand that as of now the only way is user's manual intervention
(under which I'd include any
