Hi,
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 04:40:47PM +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
>
> Repost to a wider audience, to raise awareness for this.
> ocf_take_lock may or may not be better than nothing.
>
> It at least "annotates" that the auther would like to protect something
> that is considered a "critical reg
On 21/06/17 16:40 +0200, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> Repost to a wider audience, to raise awareness for this.
Appreciated, Lars.
Adding developers ML for possibly even larger outreach.
> ocf_take_lock may or may not be better than nothing.
>
> It at least "annotates" that the auther would like to pr
Repost to a wider audience, to raise awareness for this.
ocf_take_lock may or may not be better than nothing.
It at least "annotates" that the auther would like to protect something
that is considered a "critical region" of the resource agent.
At the same time, it does NOT deliver what the name
