Gentle Reminder!!
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 1:14 PM Rohit Saini
wrote:
> Gentle Reminder!!
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:10 PM Rohit Saini <
> rohitsaini111.fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I know pacemaker booth is being used for geographical redundancy.
>> Currently I am using pacemak
Gentle Reminder!!
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 12:10 PM Rohit Saini
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I know pacemaker booth is being used for geographical redundancy.
> Currently I am using pacemaker/corosync for my local two-node redundancy.
> As I understand, booth needs atleast 3 nodes to work correctly to do
On 7/15/19 9:57 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 12:10 +0530, Rohit Saini wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I know pacemaker booth is being used for geographical redundancy.
>> Currently I am using pacemaker/corosync for my local two-node
>> redundancy.
>> As I understand, booth needs atleast 3
On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 12:10 +0530, Rohit Saini wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I know pacemaker booth is being used for geographical redundancy.
> Currently I am using pacemaker/corosync for my local two-node
> redundancy.
> As I understand, booth needs atleast 3 nodes to work correctly to do
> the automatic
Hi All,
I know pacemaker booth is being used for geographical redundancy. Currently
I am using pacemaker/corosync for my local two-node redundancy.
As I understand, booth needs atleast 3 nodes to work correctly to do the
automatic failovers. So it does not fit my requirements.
Few queries are
1)
