Thanks guys, very appreciated.
Jan Pokorný napsal(a):
>* [Hui, no need to address us individually along with the list, we are
*>* both subscribed to it since around the beginning]
*>>* On 26/06/17 16:10 +0800, Hui Xiang wrote:
*>>* Thanks guys!!
** @Ken
*>>* I did "ifconfig ethx down" to make
Jan Pokorný napsal(a):
[Hui, no need to address us individually along with the list, we are
both subscribed to it since around the beginning]
On 26/06/17 16:10 +0800, Hui Xiang wrote:
Thanks guys!!
@Ken
I did "ifconfig ethx down" to make the cluster interface down.
That's what I suspected an
[Hui, no need to address us individually along with the list, we are
both subscribed to it since around the beginning]
On 26/06/17 16:10 +0800, Hui Xiang wrote:
> Thanks guys!!
>
> @Ken
> I did "ifconfig ethx down" to make the cluster interface down.
That's what I suspected and what I tried to s
rlabs.org/pipermail/users/2015-July/000878.html
Thanks.
From: Jan Pokorn?
To: users@clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] vip is not removed after node lost
connection with the other two nodes
Message-ID: <20170623162428.gj16...@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&quo
On 06/23/2017 11:52 AM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> On 06/23/2017 11:24 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>
>> People using ifdown or the iproute-based equivalent seem far
>> too prevalent, even if for long time bystanders the idea looks
>> continually disproved ad nauseam.
>
> Has anyone had a network card fai
On 06/23/2017 11:24 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> People using ifdown or the iproute-based equivalent seem far
> too prevalent, even if for long time bystanders the idea looks
> continually disproved ad nauseam.
Has anyone had a network card fail recently and what does that look like
on modern kernels
On 23/06/17 08:48 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 06/22/2017 09:44 PM, Hui Xiang wrote:
>> I have setup 3 nodes(node-1, node-2, node-3) as controller nodes, an
>> vip is selected by pacemaker between them, after manually make the
>> management interface down in node-1 (used by corosync) but still
On 06/22/2017 09:44 PM, Hui Xiang wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have setup 3 nodes(node-1, node-2, node-3) as controller nodes, an
> vip is selected by pacemaker between them, after manually make the
> management interface down in node-1 (used by corosync) but still have
> connectivity to public or no
Hi guys,
I have setup 3 nodes(node-1, node-2, node-3) as controller nodes, an vip
is selected by pacemaker between them, after manually make the management
interface down in node-1 (used by corosync) but still have connectivity to
public or non-management network, I was expecting that the vip in