-Original Message-
From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 2:49 AM
To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Memory leak in crm_mon ?
> On 10 Aug 2015, at 5:33 pm, Attila Megyeri wrote:
> On 13 Aug 2015, at 11:36 pm, Ulrich Windl
> wrote:
>
Kostiantyn Ponomarenko schrieb am
13.08.2015
> um 13:39 in Nachricht
> :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Brief description of the STONITH problem:
>>
>> I see two different behaviors with two different STONITH configurations. If
>> Pacemaker can
I can't seem to track this down and am hoping someone has seen this or can
tell me what's happening.
I have a 2 node test cluster, node01.private and node02.private.
[root@node01 ~]# cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost
::1 localhost
192.168.168.9 node01.private
192.168.168.10 node02.
Thank you for the help :-)
On Aug 13, 2015 20:19, "Digimer" wrote:
> Ah, yes. If it's a RHEL/CentOS machine, put it in /usr/sbin/. If it's
> another OS, locate fence_ipmilan and put your agent in the same directory.
>
> digimer
>
> On 13/08/15 01:03 PM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
> > Sorry, I
Ah, yes. If it's a RHEL/CentOS machine, put it in /usr/sbin/. If it's
another OS, locate fence_ipmilan and put your agent in the same directory.
digimer
On 13/08/15 01:03 PM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
> Sorry, I should be more clear.
> I mean the place where I must put my agent so it is visib
Sorry, I should be more clear.
I mean the place where I must put my agent so it is visible to the cluster.
For example I know that you need to put your agent into /usr/sbin/ and
start its name with "fence_" in order to get it visible to the cluster.
So I want to know the rules, are there other plac
On 13/08/15 07:54 AM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
> Digimer,
>
> Thank you. I will try this out.
> One more question. What about directories for those agents, what rules
> are here?
>
> Thank you,
> Kostya
I'm not entirely sure I understand the question, sorry. What do you mean
by "directories
On 13/08/15 04:38 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Miloš Kozák schrieb am 13.08.2015 um 09:56 in
> Nachricht
> <55cc4daa.4020...@lejmr.com>:
>
>>
>> Dne 13.8.2015 v 09:26 Andrei Borzenkov napsal(a):
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Miloš Kozák
> wrote:
However,
this does not make se
>>> Kostiantyn Ponomarenko schrieb am
>>> 13.08.2015
um 13:39 in Nachricht
:
> Hi,
>
> Brief description of the STONITH problem:
>
> I see two different behaviors with two different STONITH configurations. If
> Pacemaker cannot find a device that can STONITH a problematic node, the
> node remai
On 13/08/15 10:38 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Miloš Kozák schrieb am 13.08.2015 um 09:56 in
>>> Nachricht <55cc4daa.4020...@lejmr.com>:
>
>>
>> Dne 13.8.2015 v 09:26 Andrei Borzenkov napsal(a):
>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Miloš Kozák
>>> wrote:
However, this does not make sen
> Then make sure it can be stonithd. Add additional stonith agent using
> independent communication channel.
Not possible. Only one node up and running in the cluster and I am
wondering - can it STONITH itself? Because most likely, after reboot, the
problem can be gone.
> I have no idea what fenc
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Brief description of the STONITH problem:
>
> I see two different behaviors with two different STONITH configurations. If
> Pacemaker cannot find a device that can STONITH a problematic node, the node
> remains up and running
DOH! Please ignore my mail - i live in the past ;)
Last mail in archive is from Jul.
Stefan
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http:/
Well - i see all mails from today on the link you've provided.
Cheers,
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kostiantyn Ponomarenko
Gesendet: Don 13 August 2015 13:51
An: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
Betreff: [ClusterLabs] question on www.g
Digimer,
Thank you. I will try this out.
One more question. What about directories for those agents, what rules are
here?
Thank you,
Kostya
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 11/08/15 11:17 AM, Kostiantyn Ponomarenko wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Is there any documentation whic
Hi,
I noticed that after moving to the new mailing list there is no more
updates here:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/users/
Can it be fixed or am I missing something? I was a convenient way of
searching/reading/tracking issues.
Thank you,
Kostya
__
Hi,
Brief description of the STONITH problem:
I see two different behaviors with two different STONITH configurations. If
Pacemaker cannot find a device that can STONITH a problematic node, the
node remains up and running. Which is bad, because it must be STONITHed.
As opposite to it, if Pacemake
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 13.08.2015 um 11:33 in
Nachricht
:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Ulrich Windl
> wrote:
>> And what exactly is your problem?
>
> Real life example. Database resource depends on storage resource(s).
> There are multiple filesystems/volumes with database files.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Ulrich Windl
wrote:
> And what exactly is your problem?
Real life example. Database resource depends on storage resource(s).
There are multiple filesystems/volumes with database files. Database
admin needs to increase available space. You add new storage,
configu
>>> Miloš Kozák schrieb am 13.08.2015 um 09:56 in
Nachricht
<55cc4daa.4020...@lejmr.com>:
>
> Dne 13.8.2015 v 09:26 Andrei Borzenkov napsal(a):
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Miloš Kozák
wrote:
>>> However,
>>> this does not make sense at all. Presumably, the pacemaker should get
> alo
>>> Miloš Kozák schrieb am 13.08.2015 um 09:01 in
Nachricht
<55cc40b1.7090...@lejmr.com>:
> However,
> this does not make sense at all. Presumably, the pacemaker should get
> along with lsb scripts which comes from system repository, right?
I don't think pacemaker is a technology to handle bro
And what exactly is your problem? If you change a resource, it will be
restrted, and if a resource is restarted, constraints will be followed...
Despite of that: If I understand your configuration correctly, it's very much
the same as
resource_group
ip1
ip2
apache1
Regards,
Ulrich
>>> Joh
Dne 13.8.2015 v 09:26 Andrei Borzenkov napsal(a):
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Miloš Kozák wrote:
However,
this does not make sense at all. Presumably, the pacemaker should get along
with lsb scripts which comes from system repository, right?
Let's forget about pacemaker for a moment
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Miloš Kozák wrote:
> However,
> this does not make sense at all. Presumably, the pacemaker should get along
> with lsb scripts which comes from system repository, right?
>
Let's forget about pacemaker for a moment. You have system startup
where service B needs s
However,
this does not make sense at all. Presumably, the pacemaker should get
along with lsb scripts which comes from system repository, right?
Therefore, there is not way how to modify lsb script because changes is
lsb script erase after every package update.
I believe, the systematical
25 matches
Mail list logo
