Re: [ClusterLabs] VG activation on Active/Passive

2015-08-31 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
Отправлено с iPhone > 29 авг. 2015 г., в 21:51, Jorge Fábregas > написал(а): > >> On 08/29/2015 02:37 PM, Digimer wrote: >> No need for clustered LVM, only the active node should see the PV. When >> the passive takes over, after connecting to the PV, it should do a >> pvscan -> vgscan -> lvsc

Re: [ClusterLabs] Resources within a Group

2015-08-31 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 08/28/2015 07:46 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote: > On 08/28/2015 10:06 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: >> I'm wondering if maybe you were using the term "group" generically? The >> other responses were referring to Pacemaker's explicit group syntax. > > Hi Ken, > > Yes, I was referring to Pacemaker's group s

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: VG activation on Active/Passive

2015-08-31 Thread Jorge Fábregas
On 08/31/2015 02:41 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Actually when using ext3 I wouldn't use cLVM, so this variant > wouldn't exist then. Hi Ulrich, I tried it first without cLVM (so I could get rid of DLM as well) but then you have to modify /etc/lvm/lvm.conf accordingly. You have to activate the "vol

Re: [ClusterLabs] "0 Nodes configured" in crm_mon

2015-08-31 Thread Stanislav Kopp
Hi Honza, thanks for the hint, I've upgraded libqb to 0.17.2 and it works much better now! Best, Stan 2015-08-31 10:24 GMT+02:00 Jan Friesse : > Stanislav, > >> Hi Ken, >> >> >> thanks for the info, I will try 2.3.4 or maybe even 2.3.3 like in >> original compilation guide. > > > also maybe you

Re: [ClusterLabs] "0 Nodes configured" in crm_mon

2015-08-31 Thread Jan Friesse
Stanislav, > Hi Ken, thanks for the info, I will try 2.3.4 or maybe even 2.3.3 like in original compilation guide. also maybe you are hitting same problem as was discussed on list in thread (Corosync: 100% cpu (corosync 2.3.5, libqb 0.17.1, pacemaker 1.1.13) Solution is ether apply 7f56f58