[ClusterLabs] Antw: Failover to spare node

2015-10-22 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Andrei Borzenkov schrieb am 22.10.2015 um 18:49 in Nachricht <562913b5.6070...@gmail.com>: > Let's say I have a pool of nodes and multiple services, somehow > distributed across them. I would like to keep one node as "spare", > without services by default, and if any of "worker" nodes fail,

Re: [ClusterLabs] Failover to spare node

2015-10-22 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
22.10.2015 19:49, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: Let's say I have a pool of nodes and multiple services, somehow distributed across them. I would like to keep one node as "spare", without services by default, and if any of "worker" nodes fail, services that were running there should be relocated to spar

[ClusterLabs] Failover to spare node

2015-10-22 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
Let's say I have a pool of nodes and multiple services, somehow distributed across them. I would like to keep one node as "spare", without services by default, and if any of "worker" nodes fail, services that were running there should be relocated to spare together. This ensures each service k

Re: [ClusterLabs] Resource location node preference

2015-10-22 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
22.10.2015 18:25, Vallevand, Mark K пишет: Suppose I have a resource defined with a preference of node1 over node2. The resource is running on node1. Node1 goes away. Now the resource is running on node2. Node1 comes back and joins the cluster. Will the resource relocate to Node1? Witho

[ClusterLabs] Resource location node preference

2015-10-22 Thread Vallevand, Mark K
Suppose I have a resource defined with a preference of node1 over node2. The resource is running on node1. Node1 goes away. Now the resource is running on node2. Node1 comes back and joins the cluster. Will the resource relocate to Node1? Regards. Mark K Vallevand mark.vallev...@unisys.co

Re: [ClusterLabs] [ANNOUNCE] [HA] new #openstack-ha IRC channel on FreeNode

2015-10-22 Thread Digimer
Putting my "general open source HA rep" hat on... In the last year, we've worked hard to consolidate a plethora of different HA resource under one "Cluster Labs" umbrella. This was done, primarily, to help new users to HA find the right place to ask for help. Cluster Labs itself is a general clea

Re: [ClusterLabs] [ANNOUNCE] [HA] new #openstack-ha IRC channel on FreeNode

2015-10-22 Thread Adam Spiers
Sorry! It would have helped if I'd used the right address for the openstack list in the To: and Reply-To: headers :-/ Hopefully second time lucky ... Adam Spiers wrote: > [cross-posting to several lists; please trim the recipients list > before replying!] > > Hi all, > > After discussion with

[ClusterLabs] [ANNOUNCE] [HA] new #openstack-ha IRC channel on FreeNode

2015-10-22 Thread Adam Spiers
[cross-posting to several lists; please trim the recipients list before replying!] Hi all, After discussion with members of the openstack-infra team, I registered new FreeNode IRC channel #openstack-ha. Discussion on all aspects of OpenStack High Availability is welcome in this channel. Hopefull

Re: [ClusterLabs] Wireshark dissector for corosync/totem packes.

2015-10-22 Thread Christine Caulfield
On 20/10/15 21:20, Vallevand, Mark K wrote: > OK, I guess that the data is encrypted in the corosync/token packet. > IIRC you can tell wireshark what the encryption key is and it will decrypt the packets for you. later: https://github.com/masatake/wireshark-plugin-rhcs Chrissie > > Regard

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: difference between OCF return codes for monitor action

2015-10-22 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! I think the RAs' exit codes should be defined on the resource (agent)'s state only, not on the reaction pacemaker will perform. Otherwise the idea of universal resource agents will never work. Regards, Ulrich >>> "Vallevand, Mark K" schrieb am 21.10.2015 um 16:36 in Nachricht <6555c5b6072f4