Re: [ClusterLabs] cluster does not detect kill on pacemaker process ?

On 04/07/2017 05:20 PM, neeraj ch wrote: > I am running it on centos 6.6. I am killing the "pacemakerd" process > using kill -9. pacemakerd is a supervisor process that watches the other processes, and respawns them if they die. It is not really responsible for anything in the cluster directly.

Re: [ClusterLabs] cluster does not detect kill on pacemaker process ?

I am running it on centos 6.6. I am killing the "pacemakerd" process using kill -9. hmm, stonith is used for detection as well? I thought it was used to disable malfunctioning nodes. On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 04/05/2017 05:16 PM, neeraj ch

Re: [ClusterLabs] [Problem] The crmd causes an error of xml.

Hi Ken, Thank you for comment Okay! I wait for a correction. Many thanks! Hideo Yamauchi. - Original Message - > From: Ken Gaillot > To: users@clusterlabs.org > Cc: > Date: 2017/4/8, Sat 05:04 > Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] [Problem] The crmd causes an error of

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fraud Detection Check?

> On a serious note, I too received your e-mails without any red flags attached. Thanks for the confirmation. I guess I'm the only one seeing those warnings. Maybe Office 365 has a problem with ClusterLabs. ;-) -- Eric Robinson ___ Users mailing list:

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fraud Detection Check?

On 04/07/2017 02:22 PM, Eric Robinson wrote: >>> You guys got a thing against Office 365? > >> doesn't everybody? > > Fair enough. ;) On a serious note, I too received your e-mails without any red flags attached. -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison --

Re: [ClusterLabs] [Problem] The crmd causes an error of xml.

On 04/06/2017 08:49 AM, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi All, > > I confirmed a development edition of Pacemaker. > - > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/tree/71dbd128c7b0a923c472c8e564d33a0ba1816cb5 > > > property no-quorum-policy="ignore" \ > stonith-enabled="true"

Re: [ClusterLabs] Can't See Why This Cluster Failed Over

On 04/07/2017 12:58 PM, Eric Robinson wrote: > Somebody want to look at this log and tell me why the cluster failed over? > All we did was add a new resource. We've done it many times before without > any problems. > > -- > > Apr 03 08:50:30 [22762] ha14acib: info:

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fraud Detection Check?

> I've received your emails without any alteration or flagging as "fraud". > So I don't think we're doing anything to your emails. Good to know. -- Eric Robinson ___ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fraud Detection Check?

>> You guys got a thing against Office 365? > doesn't everybody? Fair enough. -- Eric Robinson ___ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting

Re: [ClusterLabs] Fraud Detection Check?

On 04/07/2017 01:32 PM, Eric Robinson wrote: > You guys got a thing against Office 365? doesn't everybody? -- Dimitri Maziuk Programmer/sysadmin BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [ClusterLabs] Can't See Why This Cluster Failed Over

Somebody want to look at this log and tell me why the cluster failed over? All we did was add a new resource. We've done it many times before without any problems. -- Apr 03 08:50:30 [22762] ha14acib: info: cib_process_request: Forwarding cib_apply_diff operation for

[ClusterLabs] Can't See Why This Cluster Failed Over

Somebody want to look at this log and tell me why the cluster failed over? All we did was add a new resource. We've done it many times before without any problems. -- Apr 03 08:50:30 [22762] ha14acib: info: cib_process_request: Forwarding cib_apply_diff operation for