[ClusterLabs] FYI ClusterLabs mail server upgrade this weekend

FYI, we will move the ClusterLabs mailing lists to an upgraded server this weekend (most likely Sunday). If anyone has problems sending or receiving mail from the lists next week, feel free to e-mail me directly (address in signature below). -- Ken Gaillot

[ClusterLabs] One volume is trimmable but the other is not?

I sent this to the drbd list too, but it's possible that someone here may know. This is a WEIRD one. Why would one drbd volume be trimmable and the other one not? Here you can see me issuing the trim command against two different filesystems. It works on one but fails on the other. ha11a:~ #

Re: [ClusterLabs] Misunderstanding or bug in crm_simulate output

On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 17:45 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:42:56 -0600 > Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 00:37 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:54:33 -0600 > > > Ken Gaillot

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On 2018-01-25 01:28 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 13:06 -0500, Digimer wrote: >> On 2018-01-25 11:11 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: >>> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 20:58 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais >>> wrote: On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:28:03 -0600 Ken Gaillot

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 13:06 -0500, Digimer wrote: > On 2018-01-25 11:11 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 20:58 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:28:03 -0600 > > > Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > > > > > I think there's enough

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On 2018-01-25 11:11 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 20:58 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:28:03 -0600 >> Ken Gaillot wrote: >> >>> I think there's enough sentiment for "promoted"/"started" as the >>> role >>> names, since it

Re: [ClusterLabs] Corosync 3.0 - Alpha1 is available at corosync.org!

On 2018-01-25 11:59 AM, Jan Friesse wrote: > I am pleased to announce the first testing (Alpha 1) release of Corosync > 3.0 (codename Camelback) available immediately from our website at > http://build.clusterlabs.org/corosync/releases/ as corosync-2.99.0. > > Corosync 3.0 contains many

Re: [ClusterLabs] Misunderstanding or bug in crm_simulate output

On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 17:42:56 -0600 Ken Gaillot wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 00:37 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 10:54:33 -0600 > > Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 16:15 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 20:58 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:28:03 -0600 > Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > I think there's enough sentiment for "promoted"/"started" as the > > role > > names, since it most directly reflects how pacemaker uses them.

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 11:31 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:28:16 +0100 > Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:03:34 +0100 > > Ivan Devát wrote: > > > > > > I think there's enough sentiment for

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 11:28:16 +0100 Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:03:34 +0100 > Ivan Devát wrote: > > > > I think there's enough sentiment for "promoted"/"started" as the role > > > names, since it most directly reflects how

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:03:34 +0100 Ivan Devát wrote: > > I think there's enough sentiment for "promoted"/"started" as the role > > names, since it most directly reflects how pacemaker uses them. > > > Just a question. > The property "role" of a resource operation can have

Re: [ClusterLabs] Feedback wanted: changing "master/slave" terminology

Hi, I think there's enough sentiment for "promoted"/"started" as the role names, since it most directly reflects how pacemaker uses them. Just a question. The property "role" of a resource operation can have values: "Stopped", "Started" and in the case of multi-state resources, "Slave" and