On 04/02/2018 04:02 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 10:54 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 09:01:15 +0300
>> Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>
>>> 31.03.2018 23:29, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais пишет:
Hi all,
I experienced
Yes, my resource are started and they are slave status. So I run "pcs resource
cleanup pgsql-ha" command. The log shows the error when I run this command.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Users [mailto:users-boun...@clusterlabs.org] 代表 Andrei Borzenkov
发送时间: 2018年4月3日 12:00
收件人: users@clusterlabs.org
主题: Re:
03.04.2018 05:07, 范国腾 пишет:
> Hello,
>
> I want to setup a cluster in two nodes. One is master and the other is slave.
> I don’t need the fencing device because my internal network is stable. I use
> the following command to create the resource, but all of the two nodes are
> slave and
Hello,
I want to setup a cluster in two nodes. One is master and the other is slave. I
don’t need the fencing device because my internal network is stable. I use the
following command to create the resource, but all of the two nodes are slave
and cluster don’t promote it to master. Could you
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:36 PM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <
j...@dalibo.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 09:32:41 +1100
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <
> > j...@dalibo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018
Hi!
I've set up a couple test Pacemaker/Corosync/PCS clusters on virtual machines
to manage a PostgreSQL service using the PostgreSQL Automatic Failover (PAF)
resource agent available here: https://clusterlabs.github.io/PAF/
The cluster will be up and running with 3 nodes and PostgreSQL
Is there any way that I can order the startup of resources A, B, C in that
order such that if B fails to start for some reason, A and C will still start,
but the order of operations will always be start A, start B, start C?
I've tried setting it like this:
set rscA rscB.master rscC action=start
On Mon, 2018-04-02 at 10:54 +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 09:01:15 +0300
> Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>
> > 31.03.2018 23:29, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais пишет:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I experienced a problem in a two node cluster. It has one
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 09:01:15 +0300
Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 31.03.2018 23:29, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais пишет:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I experienced a problem in a two node cluster. It has one FA per node and
> > location constraints to avoid the node each of them are