All,
We are pleased to announce the general availability of kronosnet v1.13
kronosnet (or knet for short) is the new underlying network protocol for
Linux HA components (corosync), that features the ability to use
multiple links between nodes, active/active and active/passive link
failover
>mailto:kgail...@redhat.com]
>Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 12:02 PM
>
>If you have SELinux enabled, check for denials. The cluster processes have a
>different SELinux context than systemd, so policies might not be set up
>correctly.
>--
>Ken Gaillot
Alas, SELinux is not in use.
I am
Hi Team,
Thanks for your support,
Actually we are facing issue in running PCS in a pod on openshift.
Scenario :- We have two zabbix VM's which are running in a PCS cluster. Now we
want that pod in the VM pcs cluster, We have already install the packages and
start the pcsd service in the pod.
- On Oct 16, 2019, at 8:27 AM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
> On 2019-10-16 2:16 a.m., Ulrich Windl wrote:
> "Lentes, Bernd" schrieb am 15.10.2019
>> um
>> 21:35 in Nachricht
>> <1922568650.3402980.1571168140600.javamail.zim...@helmholtz-muenchen.de>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i'm a big fan
On 10/16/19 3:19 PM, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Roger Zhou schrieb am 16.10.2019 um 08:54 in Nachricht
> :
>> Hi Bernd,
>>
>> Apart from Ken's insights.
>>
>> I try to put it simple between systemd vs. pacemaker:
>>
>> pacemaker does manage dependencies among nodes, well, systemd just not.
>
>
ClusterLabs is happy to announce resource-agents v4.4.0 rc1.
Source code is available at:
https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/releases/tag/v4.4.0rc1
The most significant enhancements in this release are:
- bugfixes and enhancements:
- All RA: Use _default variables for all parameters
>>> Ulrich Windl schrieb am 16.10.2019 um 10:53 in Nachricht <5DA6DA93.232 :
>>> 161 :
60728>:
> Hi!
>
> I just discovered an interesting problem with my own RA that allows a
> boolean parameter:
> Where is the exact syntax for "boolean" defined, and who's responsible for
> checking it? The RA
>>> Oyvind Albrigtsen schrieb am 16.10.2019 um 11:02 in
Nachricht <20191016090219.z5jz4tnd5hxi7...@redhat.com>:
> On 16/10/19 10:53 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>Hi!
>>
>>I just discovered an interesting problem with my own RA that allows a
boolean
> parameter:
>>Where is the exact syntax for
>>> Oyvind Albrigtsen schrieb am 16.10.2019 um 11:02 in
Nachricht <20191016090219.z5jz4tnd5hxi7...@redhat.com>:
> On 16/10/19 10:53 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>Hi!
>>
>>I just discovered an interesting problem with my own RA that allows a
boolean
> parameter:
>>Where is the exact syntax for
>>> "Ulrich Windl" schrieb am 16.10.2019
um
10:53 in Nachricht <5da6da9302a100034...@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>:
> Hi!
>
> I just discovered an interesting problem with my own RA that allows a
> boolean parameter:
> Where is the exact syntax for "boolean" defined, and who's responsible for
On 16/10/19 10:53 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Hi!
I just discovered an interesting problem with my own RA that allows a boolean
parameter:
Where is the exact syntax for "boolean" defined, and who's responsible for
checking it? The RA or (e.g.) crm?
The concrete problem is that my RA expected
>>> Ulrich Windl schrieb am 15.10.2019 um 10:26 in Nachricht <5DA582C3.BDB :
>>> 161 :
60728>:
> Hi!
>
> I was trying to do a "crm resource migrate" the first time in SLES 12 (the
> way I did in SLES11), but I got this message:
> # crm resource migrate prm_isr_mail1 PT10M
> ERROR:
Hi!
I just discovered an interesting problem with my own RA that allows a boolean
parameter:
Where is the exact syntax for "boolean" defined, and who's responsible for
checking it? The RA or (e.g.) crm?
The concrete problem is that my RA expected the boolean parameter to be either
'0' or '1',
Hi,
did anybody succeed in installing / compiling DRBD for CentOS8? It seems
to cause some trouble in my setup.
Michael Schwartzkopff
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
--
[*] sys4 AG
https://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Schleißheimer Straße 26/MG,80333 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft: München,
>>> Roger Zhou schrieb am 16.10.2019 um 08:54 in Nachricht
:
> Hi Bernd,
>
> Apart from Ken's insights.
>
> I try to put it simple between systemd vs. pacemaker:
>
> pacemaker does manage dependencies among nodes, well, systemd just not.
What I also wanted to say is (maybe the reason for
Hi Bernd,
Apart from Ken's insights.
I try to put it simple between systemd vs. pacemaker:
pacemaker does manage dependencies among nodes, well, systemd just not.
Cheers,
Roger
On 10/16/19 5:16 AM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 21:35 +0200, Lentes, Bernd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i'm a
On 2019-10-16 2:16 a.m., Ulrich Windl wrote:
"Lentes, Bernd" schrieb am 15.10.2019
> um
> 21:35 in Nachricht
> <1922568650.3402980.1571168140600.javamail.zim...@helmholtz-muenchen.de>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i'm a big fan of simple solutions (KISS).
>> Currently i have DLM, cLVM, GFS2 and OCFS2
>>> "Lentes, Bernd" schrieb am 15.10.2019
um
21:35 in Nachricht
<1922568650.3402980.1571168140600.javamail.zim...@helmholtz-muenchen.de>:
> Hi,
>
> i'm a big fan of simple solutions (KISS).
> Currently i have DLM, cLVM, GFS2 and OCFS2 managed by pacemaker.
> They all are fundamental
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 15.10.2019 um 18:15 in
Nachricht
<8e638da987edbe3c2b158c705d5620726a021d8e.ca...@redhat.com>:
> On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 08:42 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> > > > Ken Gaillot schrieb am 15.10.2019 um
>> > > > 00:47 in
>>
>> Nachricht
>> :
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > With
19 matches
Mail list logo
