-08-10 at 11:02 +, Tomer Azran wrote:
> That looks exactly what I needed - it works.
> I had to change the RA since I don't want to give an interface name as a
> parameter (it might change from server to server and I want to create a
> cloned resource).
> I changed the RA a little
: Vladislav Bogdanov [mailto:bub...@hoster-ok.com]
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 9:22 PM
To: users@clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] IPaddr2 RA and bonding
07.08.2017 20:39, Tomer Azran wrote:
> I don't want to use this approach since I don't want to be depend on pinging
> to othe
to open-source clustering welcomed, Tomer
Azran
On 07/24/2017 05:15 PM, Tomer Azran wrote:
I still don't understand why the qdevice concept doesn't help on this
situation. Since the master node is down, I would expect the quorum to declare
it as dead.
Why doesn't it happens?
That is not how
ailto:dmitri.maz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 2017-07-24 07:51, Tomer Azran wrote:
> We don't have the ability to use it.
> Is that the only solution?
No, but I'd recommend thinking about it first. Are you sure you will
care about your cluster working when your server room is on fire? 'Cause
unles
ze
Banka: Fio banka a.s.
Číslo účtu: 2400330446/2010
BIC: FIOBCZPPXX
IBAN: CZ82 2010 0024 0033 0446
On 24 Jul 2017, at 17:27, Klaus Wenninger
<kwenn...@redhat.com<mailto:kwenn...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 07/24/2017 05:15 PM, Tomer Azran wrote:
I still don't understand
Hello,
We built a pacemaker cluster with 2 physical servers.
We configured DRBD in Master\Slave setup, a floating IP and file system mount
in Active\Passive mode.
We configured two STONITH devices (fence_ipmilan), one for each server.
We are trying to simulate a situation when the Master server
350 vedená u Městského soudu v Praze
Banka: Fio banka a.s.
Číslo účtu: 2400330446/2010
BIC: FIOBCZPPXX
IBAN: CZ82 2010 0024 0033 0446
On 24 Jul 2017, at 13:51, Tomer Azran
<tomer.az...@edp.co.il><mailto:tomer.az...@edp.co.il> wrote:
Hello,
We built a pacemaker cluster wit
couldn't determine the difference between them and I'm not sure which one is
the best when using two node cluster with qdevice and watchdog fencing.
Can anyone advise on that?
From: Klaus Wenninger [mailto:kwenn...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 2:19 AM
To: Tomer Azran <tomer
STONITH is enabled and working.
-Original Message-
From: Ulrich Windl [mailto:ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de]
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 2:52 PM
To: users@clusterlabs.org
Subject: [ClusterLabs] Antw: IPaddr2 RA and bonding
>>> Tomer Azran <tomer.az...@edp.co.il
-source clustering welcomed
<users@clusterlabs.org>; kwenn...@redhat.com; Prasad, Shashank
<sspra...@vanu.com>
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] Two nodes cluster issue
Tomer Azran napsal(a):
> Just updating that I added another level of fencing using watchdog-fencing.
> With
+, Tomer Azran wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> We are using CentOS 7.3 with pacemaker in order to create a cluster.
>
> Each cluster node ha a bonding interface consists of two nics.
>
> The cluster has an IPAddr2 resource configured like that:
>
>
Hello,
I'm planning to install an active\active HAProxy cluster on CentOS 7
I didn't found that there is any RA for HAproxy.
I found some on the net but I'm not sure if I need it. For example:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thisismitch/cluster-agents/master/haproxy
I can always use the
n creating the resource. In
addition, I think that the documentation should instruct the user to enable
multicast traffic on the network, which is not enabled by default.
Tomer Azran
IDM & LINUX Professional Services
tomer.az...@edp.co.il<mailto:tomer.az...@edp.co.il>
m: +972-52-6389961
t: +972
C_NO=`expr ${OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_clone:-0} + 1`
Can you think of a reason why my RA always set the local_node to "2"?
Tomer Azran
IDM & LINUX Professional Services
tomer.az...@edp.co.il
m: +972-52-6389961
t: +972-3-6438222
f: +972-3-6438004
www.edp.co.il
___
14 matches
Mail list logo
