Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker documentation license clarification

Ken Gaillot writes: > Currently, the brand is specified in each book's publican.cfg (which is > generated by configure, and can be edited by "make www-cli"). It works, > so realistically it's a low priority to improve it, given everything > else on the plate. Well, it's not

Re: [ClusterLabs] Asking for a new DLM release

Ferenc Wagner <wf...@niif.hu> writes: > DLM 4.0.2 was released on 2013-07-31. The Git repo accumulated some > fixes since then, which would be nice to have in a proper release. By the way I offer https://github.com/wferi/dlm/commits/upstream-patches for merging or cherry-picking i

Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker documentation license clarification

Ken Gaillot <kgail...@redhat.com> writes: > On 12/11/2015 10:07 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> [...] the "Legal Notice" >> section of the generated Publican documentation (for example >> Pacemaker_Explained/desktop/en-US/index.html) says that the material m

[ClusterLabs] Pacemaker documentation license clarification

Hi, We're packaging Pacemaker for Debian and this requires a clear picture of all licenses relevant to the package. The software part is clearly under GPL-2+ and LGPL-2+, which is fine. However, the "Legal Notice" section of the generated Publican documentation (for example

[ClusterLabs] Disable Corosync watchdog and monitoring

Hi, If I compiled Corosync with --enable-watchdog and --enable-monitoring, is it possible to disable these services? That is, how do I get Corosync not touch /dev/watchdog on startup? I use Pacemaker STONITH, so I think I don't need the watchdog... right? -- Thanks, Feri.

[ClusterLabs] Is STONITH resource location special?

Hi, Pacemaker Explained discusses in 13.3 the special treatment of STONITH resources. Now, I configured 6 fence_ipmilan instances in a cluster which runs on 4 nodes currently. No STONITH resource started on the node it can kill, even though I haven't configured location constraints yet. Is

[ClusterLabs] Automatic IPC buffer adjustment in Pacemaker 1.1.11?

Hi, The http://www.ultrabug.fr/tuning-pacemaker-for-large-clusters/ blog post states that "Pacemaker v1.1.11 should come with a feature which will allow the IPC layer to adjust the PCMK_ipc_buffer automagically". However, I failed to identify this in the ChangeLog. Did it really happen, can I