>>> Mohammed Alam <moal...@gmail.com> schrieb am 09.05.2016 um 08:17 in >>> Nachricht <CACDV14Mm9+hCC+dDrbj4pHAvRxhhzUceUniyPE=vakq2xuc...@mail.gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I was reading Andrew Beekhof's blog (particularly this article: > http://blog.clusterlabs.org/blog/2015/sbd-fun-and-profit/) and became very > interested in setting up a cluster using SBD fencing on a shared FCOE > storage device. I have a few quick questions. > > Would Pacemaker + SBD fencing work on both KVM hypervisor and virtuals at > the same time? I know something like this exists for XEN but wasn't sure if > KVM would be able to do something similar. > > If I wanted it just for virtual machine clusters, do the virtuals need to > be presented with an additional shared storage? (Similar to how it works at > hypervisor level) I was a bit confused about this.
See SBD as a communication media on shared storage. So you need shared storage to communicate. > > Essentially I want to get to a state where I have 3 physical nodes, running > 3-5 virtual machines each that are clustered across the 3 physical nodes, > so one virtual from each clustered set can be running on any physical node > accessing the same FCOE storage. The physical nodes don't necessary need > to be clustered. So you use SBD in the VMs, not on the hosts. > > Is this possible? Any helpful suggestions would be appreciated or if anyone > has a guide on achieving a setup like this. Haven't tried, but unless SBD uses the hsot watchdog to reset the host, it should work. Ulrich > > Thank you so much. > > Best Regards, > M.Alam _______________________________________________ Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
