On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:00:25 -0600
Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 20:11 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > 11.01.2018 19:21, Ken Gaillot пишет:
> > > On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 01:16 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:23:59 -0600
> > > > Ken
On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 20:11 +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 11.01.2018 19:21, Ken Gaillot пишет:
> > On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 01:16 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:23:59 -0600
> > > Ken Gaillot wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > My question is: has anyone used or tes
11.01.2018 19:21, Ken Gaillot пишет:
> On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 01:16 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:23:59 -0600
>> Ken Gaillot wrote:
>> ...
>>> My question is: has anyone used or tested this, or is anyone
>>> interested
>>> in this? We won't promote it to the de
On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 01:16 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:23:59 -0600
> Ken Gaillot wrote:
> ...
> > My question is: has anyone used or tested this, or is anyone
> > interested
> > in this? We won't promote it to the default schema unless it is
> > tested.
> >
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:23:59 -0600
Ken Gaillot wrote:
...
> My question is: has anyone used or tested this, or is anyone interested
> in this? We won't promote it to the default schema unless it is tested.
>
> My feeling is that it is more likely to be confusing than helpful, and
> there are prob
The pacemaker-next schema contains experimental features for testing
before potential release. To use these features, someone must
explicitly set validate-with in their configuration to pacemaker-next
(or its legacy alias, pacemaker-1.1).
There is a feature that has been hanging around in there fo
