Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker documentation license clarification

2016-01-04 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Ken Gaillot writes: > Currently, the brand is specified in each book's publican.cfg (which is > generated by configure, and can be edited by "make www-cli"). It works, > so realistically it's a low priority to improve it, given everything > else on the plate. Well, it's not

Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker documentation license clarification

2015-12-14 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 12/13/2015 06:56 PM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Ken Gaillot writes: > >> On 12/11/2015 10:07 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: >> >>> [...] the "Legal Notice" >>> section of the generated Publican documentation (for example >>> Pacemaker_Explained/desktop/en-US/index.html) says that

Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker documentation license clarification

2015-12-13 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Ken Gaillot writes: > On 12/11/2015 10:07 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> [...] the "Legal Notice" >> section of the generated Publican documentation (for example >> Pacemaker_Explained/desktop/en-US/index.html) says that the material may >> only be distributed under

[ClusterLabs] Pacemaker documentation license clarification

2015-12-11 Thread Ferenc Wagner
Hi, We're packaging Pacemaker for Debian and this requires a clear picture of all licenses relevant to the package. The software part is clearly under GPL-2+ and LGPL-2+, which is fine. However, the "Legal Notice" section of the generated Publican documentation (for example

Re: [ClusterLabs] Pacemaker documentation license clarification

2015-12-11 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 12/11/2015 10:07 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > Hi, > > We're packaging Pacemaker for Debian and this requires a clear picture > of all licenses relevant to the package. The software part is clearly > under GPL-2+ and LGPL-2+, which is fine. However, the "Legal Notice" > section of the generated