On 12/09/19 09:27 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Jan Pokorný schrieb am 10.09.2019 um 17:38
in Nachricht <20190910153832.gj29...@redhat.com>:
>>
>> Just looking at how to provisionally satisfy the needs here, I can
>> suggest this "one-liner" as a filter to let the to-archive-copies
>>
On 10/09/19 08:06 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
Ken Gaillot schrieb am 09.09.2019 um 17:14
in Nachricht
<9e51c562c74e52c3b9e5f85576210bf83144fae7.ca...@redhat.com>:
>> On Mon, 2019‑09‑09 at 11:06 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>> In recent pacemaker I see that last‑lrm‑refresh is
On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 11:06 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In recent pacemaker I see that last-lrm-refresh is included in the
> CIB config (crm_config/cluster_property_set), so CIBs are "different"
> when they are actually the same.
>
> Example diff:
> - name="last-lrm-refresh"
Hi!
In recent pacemaker I see that last-lrm-refresh is included in the CIB config
(crm_config/cluster_property_set), so CIBs are "different" when they are
actually the same.
Example diff:
-
+
I don't see a reason for having that. Can someone explain?
Regards,
Ulrich
