s - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] agent ocf:pacemaker:controld
On 18/07/16 07:59, Da Shi Cao wrote:
dlm_controld is very tightly coupled with cman.
Wrong assumption.
In fact, support for shipping ocf:pacemaker:controld has been
explicitly re
"pacemaker+corosync"! Am I wrong?
Thanks a lot!
Dashi Cao
From: Da Shi Cao <dscao...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 9:31:51 PM
To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] agent oc
com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 4:47:31 PM
To: Cluster Labs - All topics related to open-source clustering welcomed
Subject: Re: [ClusterLabs] agent ocf:pacemaker:controld
Thank you all for the information about dlm_controld. I will make a try using
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/dlm.g
> On 18/07/16 07:59, Da Shi Cao wrote:
>> dlm_controld is very tightly coupled with cman.
Wrong assumption.
In fact, support for shipping ocf:pacemaker:controld has been
explicitly restricted to cases when CMAN logic (specifically the
respective handle-all initscript that is in turn, in that
Hi,
On 07/18/2016 02:59 PM, Da Shi Cao wrote:
dlm_controld is very tightly coupled with cman. I have built a cluster purely
with pacemaker+corosync+fence_sanlock. But if agent ocf:pacemaker:controld is
desired, dlm_controld must exist! I can only find it in cman.
Not sure I can understand
dlm_controld is very tightly coupled with cman. I have built a cluster purely
with pacemaker+corosync+fence_sanlock. But if agent ocf:pacemaker:controld is
desired, dlm_controld must exist! I can only find it in cman.
Can the command dlm_controld be obtained without bringing in cman?
Best
