On 8/30/05, Jeremy C. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Building mysqld failed on DragonFly with:
mysqld.cc: In function `void* handle_connections_sockets(void*)':
/usr/include/tcpd.h:138: error: too many arguments to function `void
sock_host()'
mysqld.cc:3649: error: at this point in file
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:10:19 -0700
Devon H. O'Dell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:03:14PM -0700, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
The point of using tools named like this is that they're in NetBSD,
OpenBSD, Linux and Solaris.
--Devon
Eh, and the purpose of removing pw in
On Tue, August 30, 2005 12:39 am, Jeremy C. Reed said:
p.s. I have over 2600 pkgsrc packages packaged for DragonFly.
Are there any plans for a repository to download from? What with the
recent ABI changes, these packages may not work on all 1.3 systems, so we
may not be able to do something
On Tue, August 30, 2005 4:32 am, Marcin Jessa said:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:10:19 -0700
Devon H. O'Dell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:03:14PM -0700, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
The point of using tools named like this is that they're in NetBSD,
OpenBSD, Linux and Solaris.
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
p.s. I have over 2600 pkgsrc packages packaged for DragonFly.
That's wonderful news! I assume you mean binary packages?
Are you feeding the patches to pkgsrc as you go? I'm asking
because I'm now trying to patch xfce4-systemload-plugin, and
I won't waste my time if
I am replying to two emails below:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
p.s. I have over 2600 pkgsrc packages packaged for DragonFly.
Are there any plans for a repository to download from? What with the
recent ABI changes, these packages may not work on all 1.3 systems, so we
may
:No plans yet. These are all built as non-root: so /home/reed/pkg is
:hard-coded in many, many places.
:
:Later, I may use a jail and run as root.
I'd be happy to setup a root jail for you on leaf in /unused3, though
right now I do not have backup storage sufficient for /unused3 so I
: - Liam J. Foy
From the dicussion so far it looks like we want these. We may not
be able to immediately remove the old utilities, especially since I'm
sure a lot of scripts use them, but the new ones have got a lot of
things going for them and I think we want
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 01:17:47AM +, Tom hummel wrote:
: - Liam J. Foy
From the dicussion so far it looks like we want these. We may not
be able to immediately remove the old utilities, especially since I'm
sure a lot of scripts use them, but the new ones
