Re: boot problem, disk mess.. thinking of suicide.

2006-09-28 Thread Oliver Fromme
Vladimir Mitiouchev wrote: Oliver Fromme wrote: And if you did, you should newfs(8) the file system when you replaced the cables with good ones. Q: Why fsck is not enough? fsck(8) is only able to detect certain (not even all, I believe) inconsistencies in the meta data of a file

Re: boot problem, disk mess.. thinking of suicide.

2006-09-28 Thread Vladimir Mitiouchev
28 Sep 2006 11:41:59 GMT, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED]: However, fsck can neither detect nor repair any damage in the contents of files. So, do You have any simple ideas how to detect damage in files? Checksums, or sth? Something simple and working. And automagic ;-) Is there any solutions?

Re: boot problem, disk mess.. thinking of suicide.

2006-09-28 Thread Erik Wikström
On 2006-09-28 14:18, Vladimir Mitiouchev wrote: 28 Sep 2006 11:41:59 GMT, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED]: However, fsck can neither detect nor repair any damage in the contents of files. So, do You have any simple ideas how to detect damage in files? Checksums, or sth? Something simple and

Re: boot problem, disk mess.. thinking of suicide.

2006-09-28 Thread Vladimir Mitiouchev
2006/9/28, Erik Wikström [EMAIL PROTECTED]: from kernel when files change. What would have been really nice in this situation is ZFS, which has built-in checksums. DragonFly supports ZFS, right? Is it stable enough to run system-for-fun? -- Sincerely Yours, Vladimir Mitiouchev

Re: boot problem, disk mess.. thinking of suicide.

2006-09-28 Thread Erik Wikström
On 2006-09-28 15:45, Vladimir Mitiouchev wrote: 2006/9/28, Erik Wikström [EMAIL PROTECTED]: from kernel when files change. What would have been really nice in this situation is ZFS, which has built-in checksums. DragonFly supports ZFS, right? Is it stable enough to run system-for-fun? No,

Re: boot problem, disk mess.. thinking of suicide.

2006-09-28 Thread Miguel Figueiredo Mascarenhas Sousa Filipe
Hi, afaik, ZFS support in DFLY hasn't arrived yet.. read this: http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/kernel/2006-06/msg00047.html On 9/28/06, Vladimir Mitiouchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2006/9/28, Erik Wikström [EMAIL PROTECTED]: from kernel when files change. What would have been really

Re: Problem with Xorg conf

2006-09-28 Thread Frank Petitjean
Le Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:44:04 +0200, Jeremy C. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: Install more fonts. Configure your system to use your preferred fonts first. Try your KControl font installer. Maybe install Windows True Type fonts (such as pkgsrc/fonts/ms-ttf). Thanks Jeremy, I understand

Re: Problem with Xorg conf

2006-09-28 Thread Gergo Szakal
Frank Petitjean wrote: I can't find ms-ttf on the servers : ftp://packages.stura.uni-rostock , and others binary mirrors diplayed here : http://www.dragonflybsd.org/community/download.cgi Can you tell me where I can find this package, please ? (sorry for this newbee question) Thought

Re: Problem with Xorg conf

2006-09-28 Thread Thomas Schlesinger
Am Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 16:31 schrieb Frank Petitjean: Le Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:44:04 +0200, Jeremy C. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit: Install more fonts. Configure your system to use your preferred fonts first. Try your KControl font installer. Maybe install Windows True Type

Re: Problem with Xorg conf

2006-09-28 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
I can't find ms-ttf on the servers : ftp://packages.stura.uni-rostock , and others binary mirrors diplayed here : http://www.dragonflybsd.org/community/download.cgi Can you tell me where I can find this package, please ? (sorry for this newbee question) I forgot about that bogus

dragonfly wine

2006-09-28 Thread David Aubril
hi everyone. Well, yet another question. I have dragonfly running on a quite old pc, so I'm waiting for pkgsrc 2006Q3 to build anything, since it's going to take a couple of hours. Well, here is my question : I didn't see any wine binary package, on any of the ftp repositories. Is

Re: dragonfly wine

2006-09-28 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:20:47PM +0200, David Aubril wrote: Well, here is my question : I didn't see any wine binary package, on any of the ftp repositories. Is there a reason for that ? Does that mean that wine doesn't build on dragonfly ? It won't run without a number of VM changes.

Re: dragonfly wine

2006-09-28 Thread Yury Tarasievich
On 28/09/06, David Aubril [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi everyone. Well, yet another question. I have dragonfly running on a quite old pc, so I'm waiting for pkgsrc 2006Q3 to build anything, since it's going to take a couple of hours. Well, here is my question : I didn't see any wine

Re: dragonfly wine

2006-09-28 Thread David Aubril
Well, unfortunately, I am not a developper ; just a french teacher. I would have love to help, but this is way too far for me. Thanks for your answers, though. Yury Tarasievich wrote: On 28/09/06, David Aubril [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi everyone. Well, yet another question. I have

Re: dragonfly wine

2006-09-28 Thread Bill Hacker
David Aubril wrote: Well, unfortunately, I am not a developper ; just a french teacher. I would have love to help, but this is way too far for me. Thanks for your answers, though. And what is it that you have discovered that the French are willing to be taught? ;-) Yury Tarasievich

lukemftp/tnftp

2006-09-28 Thread Peter Avalos
Since we're using pkgsrc, is there a good reason we have lukemftp/nftp in our src tree? It seems like it'd be best to remove it from our tree and if people want to use it, they can just install it from pkgsrc. What's everyone else think? --Peter pgp21MnipXiCV.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: lukemftp/tnftp

2006-09-28 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:36:40PM -0700, Peter Avalos wrote: Since we're using pkgsrc, is there a good reason we have lukemftp/nftp in our src tree? It seems like it'd be best to remove it from our tree and if people want to use it, they can just install it from pkgsrc. What's everyone else

Re: lukemftp/tnftp

2006-09-28 Thread Peter Avalos
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:36:40PM -0700, Peter Avalos wrote: Since we're using pkgsrc, is there a good reason we have lukemftp/nftp in our src tree? It seems like it'd be best to remove it from our tree and if people want to use it, they can just install it from pkgsrc. What's everyone else