At 02:42 AM 11/24/2006, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
On 11/24/06, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 08:56 PM 11/23/2006, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
On 11/24/06, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you post the output of em's debug_info sysctl?
I did a full cvsup upto today to see if it
Forgot one thing: please post output of vmstat -i, before/after the RX
choking :-)
Here is the same info from FreeBSD Current, post testing. The same
hardware does not wedge on it.
em0: Excessive collisions = 0
em0: Symbol errors = 0
em0: Sequence errors = 0
em0: Defer count = 0
em0:
On 11/24/06, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pre-patch
[r2-dragonfly]# ifconfig em0 down
[r2-dragonfly]# ifconfig em0 up
[r2-dragonfly]# ifconfig em1 down
[r2-dragonfly]# ifconfig em1 up
[r2-dragonfly]# vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
clk
The BGE0 test statistics you posted to the FreeBSD list were very
interesting. I'm still scratching my head wondering what changed
between 1.6 and HEAD to create such an improvement in packet rates.
The change I thought would make a big difference was when we embedded
the
:Only 34 intr came during your testing :-(
:
:Please testing following patch:
:http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/em_intr.diff
:
:See whether it helps.
:
:Best Regards,
:sephe
Ouch. I don't quite understand the jist of the patch. Clearly
it is dealing with a situation where an RX ring
