On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:23:03PM +0900, Kimura Fuyuki wrote:
OK, I give up...
Could someone tell me why the following simple program fails to print a dvd
title? It seems to read from offset 32768. (block boundary?)
... Having posted the last message, I was wondering if FreeBSD has ever
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:39:30 -0500, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
Sort of. I'm saying that if Matt rolls his own filesystem instead of
using ZFS, that new filesystem is either:
1: not going to have the variety of tools available with zfs for handling
things like disk pooling/snapshots/data
Rupert Pigott wrote:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:39:30 -0500, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
Sort of. I'm saying that if Matt rolls his own filesystem instead of
using ZFS, that new filesystem is either:
1: not going to have the variety of tools available with zfs for handling
things like disk
Rupert Pigott wrote:
I don't know if IBM's GridFS does any better with the latency, but it
certainly scales a lot better but the barrier for adoption is $$$. It
costs $$$ and it costs a lot more $$$ to train up and hire the SAs to run
it. There are other options like AFS too, but people tend to
Rupert Pigott wrote:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:39:30 -0500, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
True, but Matt has explained that ZFS doesn't provide the functionality
that DragonFlyBSD needs for cluster computing.
ZFS solves the problem of building a bigger fileserver, but it
doesn't help you
On 2/18/07, Michel Talon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rupert Pigott wrote:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:39:30 -0500, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
True, but Matt has explained that ZFS doesn't provide the functionality
that DragonFlyBSD needs for cluster computing.
ZFS solves the problem of building a
On 2/18/07, Michel Talon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rupert Pigott wrote:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:39:30 -0500, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
True, but Matt has explained that ZFS doesn't provide the functionality
that DragonFlyBSD needs for cluster computing.
ZFS solves the problem of building a
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:25:57 +0100
Michel Talon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course it is none of my business, but i have always wandered about the
real usefulness of a clustering OS in the context of free systems,
snip
Small installations are the natural target of free
systems, and in this
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
Rupert Pigott wrote:
I don't know if IBM's GridFS does any better with the latency, but it
certainly scales a lot better but the barrier for adoption is $$$. It
costs $$$ and it costs a lot more $$$ to train up and hire the SAs to run
it. There are other options
On Sunday 18 February 2007, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:23:03PM +0900, Kimura Fuyuki wrote:
OK, I give up...
Could someone tell me why the following simple program fails to print a
dvd title? It seems to read from offset 32768. (block boundary?)
... Having
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:23:38 +0100, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
Rupert Pigott wrote:
I don't know if IBM's GridFS does any better with the latency, but it
certainly scales a lot better but the barrier for adoption is $$$. It
costs $$$ and it costs a lot more $$$ to train up and hire the
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:25:57 +0100, Michel Talon wrote:
Rupert Pigott wrote:
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:39:30 -0500, Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
True, but Matt has explained that ZFS doesn't provide the functionality
that DragonFlyBSD needs for cluster computing.
ZFS solves the problem of
On Monday 19 February 2007, Kimura Fuyuki wrote:
On Sunday 18 February 2007, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:23:03PM +0900, Kimura Fuyuki wrote:
OK, I give up...
Could someone tell me why the following simple program fails to print a
dvd title? It seems to read
Bill Hacker wrote:
Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
Rupert Pigott wrote:
But a brief scan of those that were 'free' brings up the question:
'Just who is it that actually NEEDS this anyway?'
Bill Hacker
Well Rupert Pigott gave some pretty convincing explanations of the
usefulness of
14 matches
Mail list logo
