On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:57:13AM +1100, Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
> ...
> Still, the code is so short and simple all of this could be fixed in
> less time than it took to write this email. But it's something you'll
> have to get used to doing yourself, because you will soon love Python
> and be unabl
On 3/6/07, Adrian Michael Nida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just curious what's not beautiful about it? I appreciate the criticism, but
it would be more beneficial for me to hear what it needs to look like,
rather than hearing it's ugly :-)
Feel free to reply to me directly, if you wish.
It's t
On 3/6/07, Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yah, it's pretty silly. People have been logging IRC sessions and
putting them up on the web for over a decade. Nobody should have
any expectation of privacy on IRC.
Some organizations in many nations have been logging everythin
> Now, I'm happy to add whatever changes need to be done. When a consensus is
> reached, I'll do it.
I think the last irc log had last 1000 lines or something like that. Maybe
just keep a short time period like last 12 hours or last 1000 lines.
Wow, this is getting wild o_O. I never thought a simple bot would cause
such chatter.
I created this bot the way it is (recording everything for historical
purposes) because:
1) I thought that historical archives were what people wanted.
2) It was the easiest way I knew how to accomplish assum
Here it is as it has some stuff from before the bot started recording,
it goes back to Dec 20, 2006:
On second thought I think it was irresponsible to post this
without asking permission as it logs things that happened
back before the issue of logging was raised(?), and to be
courteous to those
Yah, it's pretty silly. People have been logging IRC sessions and
putting them up on the web for over a decade. Nobody should have
any expectation of privacy on IRC.
I thought even the default(?) install of irssi logs all the channels
you join so I just checked and my machine has b
:When I read the original message I thought it was a joke. Now that we're
:getting serious, could we please stop? The idea of obscuring an IRC log
:is preposterous. IRC isn't authenticated, and the log is only going to
:show nicknames. What the point of obscurity? My vote is just leave it
:as
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:50:23AM +, B. Estrade wrote:
>
> To be honest, I was halfway serious. I generally don't hide my
> identity when on irc because I don't go on to just 'hang out', but I
> do like to monitor the #dragonflybsd channel.
You know that most IRC users also log the channels
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:27:55AM -0500, Peter Avalos wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:16:04AM -0500, Adrian Michael Nida wrote:
> >
> > : I'm guessing you're serious, so I'll mention why this is a risky idea.
> > : IRC has chewing-gum authentication and it's almost trivial for a
> > : malicio
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:16:04AM -0500, Adrian Michael Nida wrote:
>
> : I'm guessing you're serious, so I'll mention why this is a risky idea.
> : IRC has chewing-gum authentication and it's almost trivial for a
> : malicious bot to fool a server into ignoring people by pretending to
> : be the
On Mon, March 5, 2007 8:16 am, Adrian Michael Nida wrote:
>
> : I'm guessing you're serious, so I'll mention why this is a risky idea.
> : IRC has chewing-gum authentication and it's almost trivial for a
> : malicious bot to fool a server into ignoring people by pretending to
> : be them, and this
: I recommend using Twisted Python as a framework, which gives you an
: IRC protocol client out of the box, good efficiency, and very neat
: daemon behavior (using twistd, for instance).
I will take your suggestion about Twisted and look into a rewrite. Thanks
for pointing it out.
: It's not b
: I'm guessing you're serious, so I'll mention why this is a risky idea.
: IRC has chewing-gum authentication and it's almost trivial for a
: malicious bot to fool a server into ignoring people by pretending to
: be them, and this can be done in many points*. Basically, the entire
: utility of the
14 matches
Mail list logo