I've found the problem that is probably a bug in libstdc++ headers,
but as other OSes seem to workaround it, I'm not sure how and where
we should fix it.
Small testcase (it's C++, fyi ;):
#define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 199309L
#include cwchar
int main() { return 0; }
It doesn't compile in
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 05:14:43 walt wrote:
Yes, I'm way off topic here, and I apologize -- but I've seen your
posts in the 'git' mail-list and you've experimented with Hg, so I
know you have your own opinions on version control systems.
Linus avoided rsync in favor of http in 'git'
FYI, seems to be http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012
regards,
--
Hasso Tepper
Elion Enterprises Ltd. [AS3249]
IP Data Networking Expert
walt wrote:
Linus avoided rsync in favor of http in 'git' because he thinks
rsync is inherently unreliable. I have *no* idea if he is right or
wrong in his opinions, but I figure you guys will favor me with your
own opinions on the subject.
Possibly for transferring the git objects. They
Huub wrote:
Can somebody tell me what's wrong please?
i guess gnome is breaking somewhere. quite probably not dragonfly's fault.
after crashing, gnome possibly leaves some traces of its breakage around (stale
processes) and thus fails to launch nautilus (or how it is called today) to
show
On Wed, April 11, 2007 7:21 am, Huub wrote:
Hi,
After finding out I can access webdav through the Computer icon/app. on
the desktop, I created the network-disk on FreeBSD 6.2, NetBSD
3.1/amd64, NetBSD 3.1/386 and DragonFlyBSD 1.9. All except the latter
work well. When I access the webdav
As corecode said, it's possible something in Gnome, which makes it hard to
tell. You may want to bring to the Gnome developers.
Hm. As I said in my post, on the other BSD flavours I have no problem. I
run gnome on all of them. Which makes it for me hard to believe it's a
(general) gnome
On Wed, April 11, 2007 2:55 pm, Huub wrote:
As corecode said, it's possible something in Gnome, which makes it hard
to
tell. You may want to bring to the Gnome developers.
Hm. As I said in my post, on the other BSD flavours I have no problem. I
run gnome on all of them. Which makes it for
Any hope/plans for getting support for the Broadcom 5780? It reports ASIC
revision 8 which doesn't seem to be supported
David
** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
Hi all,
Is there any advantage in using
'dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/vkernel/rootimg.01 bs=1m count=2048'
over the much quicker
'truncate -s 2G /var/vkernel/rootimg.01'
other than getting a root image filled with zeros?
Thanks,
Nuno
Hi Guys, does anyone got modular-xorg working? I compile with
X11_TYPE=modular in /usr/pkg/etc/mk.conf. After setting up xorg (Xorg
-configure) and type # startx i got this error, command not found so i
type # startkde and got this error cannot connect to xserver so i
guess modular-xorg-client
Just having an idea about this...are there any files in the source tree that
exceed 32kbytes?
What if a database solution were created to:
Contain every version of every file of every branch in a nicely indexed
database table
The md5/sha256 of each entry mentioned above
512 byte chunks of each
Nigel Weeks wrote:
Just having an idea about this...are there any files in the source tree that
exceed 32kbytes?
What if a database solution were created to:
Contain every version of every file of every branch in a nicely indexed
database table
The md5/sha256 of each entry mentioned above
512
On Wed, April 11, 2007 1:13 pm, Ezra Drummond wrote:
Hi Guys, does anyone got modular-xorg working? I compile with
X11_TYPE=modular in /usr/pkg/etc/mk.conf. After setting up
xorg (Xorg -configure) and type # startx i got this error, command
not found so i type # startkde and got this error
Nuno Antunes wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any advantage in using
'dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/vkernel/rootimg.01 bs=1m count=2048'
over the much quicker
'truncate -s 2G /var/vkernel/rootimg.01'
other than getting a root image filled with zeros?
not sure if the 'filled with zeros' counts as the
On 4/12/07, Justin C. Sherrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, April 11, 2007 6:00 pm, Nuno Antunes wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any advantage in using
'dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/vkernel/rootimg.01 bs=1m count=2048'
over the much quicker
'truncate -s 2G /var/vkernel/rootimg.01'
other than
Forgot to copy to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/12/07, Nuno Antunes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Nuno Antunes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Justin C. Sherrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, April 11, 2007 6:00 pm, Nuno Antunes wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any advantage in using
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:10:40 -0500 (CDT)
Jeremy C. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you need to rehash
How does one rehash?
--
Gergo Szakal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University Of Szeged, HU
Faculty Of General Medicine
/* Please do not CC me with replies, thank you. */
How does one rehash?
From the context of this discussion I'm guessing you type in rehash at
the command prompt. This is only needed if the shell is a c based
shell though. Like Jeremy said, make sure it is in your PATH.
Nevermind, looked it up on the www.
http://www.computerhope.com/unix/urehash.htm
20 matches
Mail list logo
