Bill Hacker wrote:
I'm guessing it will be a while yet before HAMMER is ready for this, but
it seems to be moving fast - and cleanly - so...
Sorry to hijack this thread. Just wanna mention a little write down of
mine about HammerFS features (and sometimes comparing it with ZFS):
:Sorry to hijack this thread. Just wanna mention a little write down of
:mine about HammerFS features (and sometimes comparing it with ZFS):
:
:http://www.ntecs.de/blog/articles/2008/01/17/zfs-vs-hammerfs
:
:I can't await to try it out in real!
:
:Regards,
:
: Michael
Nice. There are a
Michael Neumann wrote:
Bill Hacker wrote:
I'm guessing it will be a while yet before HAMMER is ready for this,
but it seems to be moving fast - and cleanly - so...
Sorry to hijack this thread. Just wanna mention a little write down of
mine about HammerFS features (and sometimes comparing it
Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Sorry to hijack this thread.
Not to worry!
It was *intended* to be 'hijacked'. Welcome!
Just wanna mention a little write down of
:mine about HammerFS features (and sometimes comparing it with ZFS):
:
:http://www.ntecs.de/blog/articles/2008/01/17/zfs-vs-hammerfs
:
On 2008-01-14, Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:I applied the patches to the development kernel and tested. So far as
:I can tell, that fixed the problem.
:
:Thank you very much, Matt, for the very fast action.
:
:- Vince
Cool. Keep testing it. I'll plan on doing some testing
