Re: Futures - HAMMER comparison testing?

2008-01-18 Thread Matthew Dillon
:But - at the end of the day - how much [extra?] on-disk space will be :needed to insure mount 'as-of' is 'good enough' for some realisitic span :(a week?, a month?)? 'Forever' may be too much to ask. The amount of disk needed is precisely the same as the amount of historical data

Re: cvsup

2008-01-18 Thread Vincent Stemen
On 2008-01-16, Simon 'corecode' Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You know that you can get a listing with rsync? sweatshorts % rsync chlamydia.fs.ei.tum.de:: No I did not know that. I have been using rsync for transferring files with ssh but had not studied the features for talking to an

Re: Futures - HAMMER comparison testing?

2008-01-18 Thread Bill Hacker
Matthew Dillon wrote: :But - at the end of the day - how much [extra?] on-disk space will be :needed to insure mount 'as-of' is 'good enough' for some realisitic span :(a week?, a month?)? 'Forever' may be too much to ask. The amount of disk needed is precisely the same as the amount of

Re: cvsup

2008-01-18 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
Vincent Stemen wrote: *** using cvsup cvsup -L 3 ./DragonFly-cvs-supfile 155.08s user 69.40s system 40% cpu 9:14.73 total I for sure didn't use cvsup for a long time, but that seems quite long. This can happen for various reasons (just guesses): - CVSup not knowing certain tags

Re: cvsup

2008-01-18 Thread Vincent Stemen
On 2008-01-18, Simon 'corecode' Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vincent Stemen wrote: *** using cvsup cvsup -L 3 ./DragonFly-cvs-supfile 155.08s user 69.40s system 40% cpu 9:14.73 total I for sure didn't use cvsup for a long time, but that seems quite long. This can happen for

Re: Futures - HAMMER comparison testing?

2008-01-18 Thread Michael Neumann
Bill Hacker wrote: Michael Neumann wrote: Bill Hacker wrote: I'm guessing it will be a while yet before HAMMER is ready for this, but it seems to be moving fast - and cleanly - so... Sorry to hijack this thread. Just wanna mention a little write down of mine about HammerFS features (and

Re: how to get dragonfly and freebsd source code

2008-01-18 Thread dark0s Optik
Indeed, I would like ti understand how programming ultrasparc microprocessors. It is a my personal interest, but I want use DragonFly. 2008/1/18, Erik Wikström [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 2008-01-18 18:54, dark0s Optik wrote: 2008/1/14, Nicolas Thery [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2008/1/14, dark0s Optik

Re: how to get dragonfly and freebsd source code

2008-01-18 Thread dark0s Optik
Ok, this is the best solution! Now, I would like to analyze freebsd code about sparc64 architecture. Can anyone to suggest me documents and people for helping to analyze above code? Thanks, dark0s 2008/1/14, Nicolas Thery [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2008/1/14, dark0s Optik [EMAIL PROTECTED]: How can I

Re: how to get dragonfly and freebsd source code

2008-01-18 Thread Erik Wikström
On 2008-01-18 18:54, dark0s Optik wrote: 2008/1/14, Nicolas Thery [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2008/1/14, dark0s Optik [EMAIL PROTECTED]: How can I to get source code of DragonFly and FreeBSD? On addition, you can also browse the source with opengrok and lxr: http://opengrok.creo.hu/dragonfly/

Re: cvsup

2008-01-18 Thread Bill Hacker
Vincent Stemen wrote: *snip* Unless I am overlooking something obvious, It is not likely so many projects would be using cvsup for as long as they have if the rsync advantage was that great, or that simple [1]. Have you: A) compared the loads and bandwidth as well as the time on BOTH

Re: Futures - HAMMER comparison testing?

2008-01-18 Thread Matthew Dillon
: So it comes down to how much space you are willing to eat up to store : the history, and what kind of granularity you will want for the history. : :OK - so it WILL be a 'tunable', then. :... :HAMMER cannot protect against all forms of human error - BUT - if it :inherently rebuilds more

Re: cvsup

2008-01-18 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 9:16 AM + 1/18/08, Vincent Stemen wrote: I realize that everything I read comparing cvsup to rsync indicates that cvsup is faster with mirroring cvs repositories. So I decided to run my own tests this evening. I thought everybody might be interested in the results. My results are not

HEADS UP: 802.11 ioctl structure size change

2008-01-18 Thread Sepherosa Ziehau
HEAD users that have checked out following change needs to do at least quickworld/realquickworld and quickkernel On Jan 19, 2008 3:34 PM, Sepherosa Ziehau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sephe 2008/01/18 23:34:13 PST DragonFly src repository Modified files: sbin/ifconfig