Re: FreeBSD 7, DragonFly's status

2008-03-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
Adrian Michael Nida wrote: SnipAndRearrange/ The benchmark at http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/os-mysql.png SnipAndRearrange/ Is measuring 1.8. We're at 1.12 now. I'm sure an updated graph has a different trend. Take it upon yourself to redo the benchmark. Hi Adrian, Per your

Re: FreeBSD 7, DragonFly's status

2008-03-08 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
On Sat, March 8, 2008 6:37 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: Dragonfly 1.12 UP performance is about 30% lower than FreeBSD 4.11 UP performance. This regression seems strange; I don't think mfs has been touched much; it may be an indirect effect of something else. The first problem was encountered

Re: FreeBSD 7, DragonFly's status

2008-03-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
Justin C. Sherrill wrote: On Sat, March 8, 2008 6:37 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: Dragonfly 1.12 UP performance is about 30% lower than FreeBSD 4.11 UP performance. This regression seems strange; I don't think mfs has been touched much; it may be an indirect effect of something else. Yeah,

Re: FreeBSD 7, DragonFly's status

2008-03-08 Thread walt
Kris Kennaway wrote: giga-snippage Summary --- As with the dragonfly 1.8 kernel, the dragonfly 1.12 kernel does not scale to a second CPU on the benchmarks performed, and the limited SMP implementation can cause a large performance loss at higher loads. There is sometimes a large performance