Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends - hacked to work

2009-02-16 Thread Bill Hacker
Matthew Dillon wrote: :I have what appears to be a 'Catch 22', wherein: : :hammer mirror-stream /master user@remote_IP:/new_slave : :returns: : :PFS slave /new-slave does not exist. :Do you want to create a new slave PFS? (yes|no) No terminal for response :Aborting operation

Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends

2009-02-16 Thread Michael Neumann
Am Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:38:54 -0800 (PST) schrieb Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com: :I have what appears to be a 'Catch 22', wherein: : :hammer mirror-stream /master user@remote_IP:/new_slave : :returns: : :PFS slave /new-slave does not exist. :Do you want to create a new slave

Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends

2009-02-16 Thread Michael Neumann
Am Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:45:45 +0100 schrieb Michael Neumann mneum...@ntecs.de: Am Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:38:54 -0800 (PST) schrieb Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com: :I have what appears to be a 'Catch 22', wherein: : :hammer mirror-stream /master user@remote_IP:/new_slave :

Re: off-box mirror-stream and friends

2009-02-16 Thread Matthew Dillon
:You mean, something like a -f (force) option? Should be damn easy to :implement. I can do that, once I sit in front of a real computer :(with DragonFly) again :) : :Regards, : : Michael Yah, go for it. -Matt

Re: hammer history ls

2009-02-16 Thread Jost Tobias Springenberg
Hi again, after some hours of sleep I took a look into the hammer sources and pushed my code in there. If anybody else cares about this option, the patch is attached to this mail. You can then basically use: hammer history-count fname to only display a count (I did not care about any

Re: hammer history ls

2009-02-16 Thread Bill Hacker
Matthew Dillon wrote: :Hi again, *trimmed* If you wanted to get really fancy you could also implement date ranges. hammer --start-date=20-Sep-2008 --end-date=01-Jan-2009 ... -Matt Yes, PLEASE! More work - one time. But bound to

Re: hammer history ls

2009-02-16 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:14:16 +0800 Bill Hacker w...@conducive.org wrote: All-numeral dating might be more human-language independent, and an input-format reminder built-in, as in: --startDDMM=20092008 --endDDMM=01012009 For all numeric it's probably best to use ISO8601