On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 02:46:15PM +1100, Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Jeremy Chadwick j...@parodius.com wrote:
I'm a little surprised to see BSD put alongside Linux when it comes to
development pace.
Certainly, I don't mean that BSD is at all keeping pace with
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:36:28PM +0100, Michael Neumann wrote:
Am Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:17:11 -0800
schrieb Jeremy Chadwick j...@parodius.com:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:59:57AM +1100, Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Bill Hacker w...@conducive.org
wrote:
Michael Neumann wrote:
Am Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:17:11 -0800
schrieb Jeremy Chadwick j...@parodius.com:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:59:57AM +1100, Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Bill Hacker w...@conducive.org
wrote:
Hopefully more 'good stuff' will be ported out of
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:36:28PM +0100, Michael Neumann wrote:
Am Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:17:11 -0800
schrieb Jeremy Chadwick j...@parodius.com:
*snip*
The one thing we all agree on is that, generally speaking, UFS isn't
cutting it. :-)
*I* don't agree.
Mind, we
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 08:12:36PM +0100, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Sun, 22.02.2009 at 06:33:44 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:36:28PM +0100, Michael Neumann wrote:
Okay zpool remove doesn't seem to work as expected, but it should
work well at least for RAID-1
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 04:53:35AM +0800, Bill Hacker wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
*snip*
The problem I was attempting to describe: all pool members must be the
same size, otherwise all members are considered to be equal to the size
of the smallest. In English: you cannot mix-and-match
Justin C. Sherrill wrote:
http://df.v12.su/mirror/
It's mirroring from chlamydia.fs.ei.tum.de nightly, so it has ISOs,
packages, etc. I get good speeds to it from the other side of the planet.
It's listed on the Downloads page on the DragonFly website now too. I'll
add FTP access when I can
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Jeremy Chadwick j...@parodius.com wrote:
I've been through this procedure twice in the past year, as I replaced
250GB disks with 500GB, and then 500GB disks with 750GB. It's a *huge*
pain, and I cannot imagine anyone in an enterprise environment using ZFS
to
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Jeremy Chadwick j...@parodius.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 01:36:28PM +0100, Michael Neumann wrote:
Okay zpool remove doesn't seem to work as expected, but it should
work well at least for RAID-1 (which probably no one uses for large
storage systems ;-).
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Bill Hacker w...@conducive.org wrote:
Side issue again - just brought up DFLY 2.3.0, default all-hammer layout.
- atop a natacontrol RAID1 on a pair of salvaged 60 GB IBM 'Deathstars'.
- VIA C7 1.5 GHz CPU (the el-cheapo MB aimed at Wal-Mart)
- pulled half the
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Csaba Henk csaba.h...@creo.hu wrote:
I need to setup a backup machine, and I intend to utilize today's
snapshotty filesystems (which boils down to Dfly+Hammer or FBSD+ZFS --
btrfs is not there yet, and I don't feel like dwelving into Solaris).
Set up such an
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Jeremy Chadwick j...@parodius.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:59:57AM +1100, Dmitri Nikulin wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Bill Hacker w...@conducive.org wrote:
Hopefully more 'good stuff' will be ported out of Solaris before it hits
the
Freddie Cash wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Csaba Henk csaba.h...@creo.hu wrote:
I need to setup a backup machine, and I intend to utilize today's
snapshotty filesystems (which boils down to Dfly+Hammer or FBSD+ZFS --
btrfs is not there yet, and I don't feel like dwelving into
13 matches
Mail list logo
